Stan,
I was not putting MixW down. I am a registered user
and have been for a few years and use it almost daily. No single program
will satisfy everyone whether it is free or not. MixW is just one of very
few that offers many thing all in one package. I have tried just about
everything t
I am most impressed by the macros in MMVARI. It has conditional statements,
loops and menus. I'd love to see that in MixW. It would make a good program
even better.
To add to the list... if I understand the new architecture right, you will
be able to plug-in modes instead of waiting for new releas
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Jerry,
>
> I will release the test version, before the turkey to-night, to the
Multipsk
> Betatesters and the definitive 3.12 version at the beginning of 2006.
>
> 73
> Patrick
>
> - Original Message ---
Posted by KK5CA
Winlink 2000 and APRS
=
After the Amateur Radio response to some recent disasters, Bob
Bruninga, WB4APR, presented the idea of using APRS (Automatic
Position Reporting System) to enable mobile and remote APRS users to
access their Winlink 2000 e-mail accoun
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Joe Ivey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Stan,
>
> I agree with you on part of what you say, but not all. I think the
main reason that MixW is so popular is the fact that it does support
most of the digital modes.
> Joe
> W4JSI
One thing I left out is ALL th
HF radio waves are blissfully ignorant of political boundaries. The
concerted actions of any significant number of amateurs will affect
operators around the world, especially those using low-power narrow-
band modes.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Barry Murrell
MixW is a fine application, but every apples-to-apples comparsion of
its PSK decoding capability with that of Moe AE4JY's PSKCORE engine
(the 48 kHz version) has shown equivalent decoding capabilities.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "xbullworker" <[EMAIL PROTE
I agree MixW is a great program why learn 10 different programs when 1 will do most modes Once everything is setup a easy program to operate most of it can be controlled by macros or f-keys Loyd K4LCHxbullworker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -> Why is it so popular.? And it isn't even fre
Murray,
How about using the modems as their own metrics, and asking the user to
set the bandwidth? Some of the modes do have metrics, but others will
have only character stream output which would have to be analyzed for
text, but that is an easier problem to solve as it is pretty much mode
ind
Gentlemen,
It is not can a voluntary band plan
work, it is will it work? The answer is simply NO. Simply put everyone think
they are right and everyone that does not see my side of the story is wrong.
Just because it is legal to operate this mode or bandwidth on this frequency
then I am
Joe W4JSI;
Exactly what I am suggesting for the other digital
modes.
Cheers de
Omar YK1AO
- Original Message -
From:
Joe
Ivey
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 7:52
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Mode
Recognition
Hi Jerry,
Yea I knew that. But maybe something similar could
be worked out for the digies.
JoeW4JSI
Age is mind over matterIf you don't mind, it does not matter
- Original Message -
From:
Jerry
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1
Joe,
The "header" in SSTV contains the "VIS" code to tell the receiver what
mode the image will be sent. Think the VIS code is in the first two
lines sent before the image lines and sync tones are sent.
HTH,
Jerry - K0HZI
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Joe Ivey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Murray,
Has anyone ever looked at the way the SSTV software
recognizes the many different modes. They all are of the same bandwidth of
course, but there are different speeds. I know nothing about writing software.
This is just a thought, nothing more.
JoeW4JSI
Age is mind over matterI
Stan,
I agree with you on part of what you say, but not
all. I think the main reason that MixW is so popular is the fact that it does
support most of the digital modes. I would not say that it copies better than
ALL other programs, but it does copy better than most. There are a lot of goo
Patrick,
I think that's a good idea, and useful for CQs - if people do't
recognise the mode first time, the waterfall will tell them for next
time you CQ is made.
I also agree that an automatic recognition tool would be quite
complex and would give little return unless it was an expensive
com
-
> Why is it so popular.? And it isn't even free ! What advantages has
> Mix W over other software ?
>
> 73, Mel G0GQK
>
Sometimes a program is worth what you pay for it. I have used many
free digital programs and they are worth what I paid for them -zero.
Do this: (I have done this many time
I have been off-line for a few days while playing tour guide for my
sister visiting from New Zealand. Sorry if some messages were delayed.
I have not had a chance to check all messages for the past week,
please keep our rules in mind. I publish them annually, so they will
be re-posted next we
Folks,
If you want support for DominoEX, wnat to swap notes or have any
questions answered, please post a message on the Yahoo MFSK Reflector.
By posting only in one place, maximum use can be made of the support
network, and it requires less work on the part of the development team.
No official
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Joe Ivey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I had the same thing here. I would have to adjust the waterfall
between the two stations. This program will need a lot of work before
it will make it.
>
> Joe
> W4JSI
>
Joe, I suggest that it's the operators who need
ENOUGH ALREADY!!
The purpose of this group: (as per Yahoo Homepage): "This is a meeting
place to discuss amateur radio digital applications such as RTTY, CW,
PSK31,PSK63, MFSK16, Olivia-MFSK, Contestia,RTTYM, Chip64, THROB, ALE,
PACTOR, AMTOR, HELL, SSTV and more. There are several reflectors
Good evening RSGB news desk/ Daily DX
As the first NON_AMERICAN and the last elected President of the
Dhahran Amateur Radio Club with the very famous call sign HZ1AB this
had to be one of the most difficult DX press releases I had the duty
to direct Thomas SM0CXU DARC Secretary to advise to
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "F.R. Ashley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> Another question about Domino EX, is everyone going to use the
default of 11baud, single space?
No Buddy, I hope not!
On 80m, especially early in the evening, you should use 8 baud. Those
who compla
Hey for all:
I'm Joaquin, EA4ZB, contest manager to the EA PSK31 CONTEST 2006.
I have the pleasure to invite to participate to the FIRST EA PSK31 CONTEST,
2006, with the follows rules:
EA PSK31 CONTEST 2006
Sponsored by Unión de Radioaficionados Españoles (URE), the worldwide EA PSK31
Conte
Obviously the ARRL is not keeping its Bandplan up
to date...
as PSK has been on 14071.5 for a very long
time...
- Original Message -
From:
Dave
Bernstein
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 2:03
AM
Subject: [digitalra
Can't think of another NGO... locally we have
repeater coordination councils.. that seem to work very well...
and I do not think they are under the ARRL?
Maybe we need to set up a Bandwidth Coordination
Council... or something like that...
But logically the ARRL would be the first
Yes, I would.
I'm skeptical of the ARRL's ability to execute given its poor track
record in this area. Is there an alternative NGO that could take on
the mission?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. Howard S. White"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So you woul
Operating PSK on 14071.5 is a violation of the current ARRL HF
bandplan. Only RTTY is permitted there.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. Howard S. White"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> having never worked 160M ... I cannot confirm your observations...
>
> But
So you would accept a "mandatory" bandplan if it
were in the hands of a non governmental organization [NGO] (such as ARRL)
as long as it had enforcement power?
I do not believe that there would be anarchy
but
I could probably live with a mandatory
bandplan and as long as we
having never worked 160M ... I cannot confirm your
observations...
But on 2M they definitely obey the bandplan... and
the voluntary repeater coordination...
__Howard S.
White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6 ex-AE6SM KY6LAWebsite: www.ky
30 matches
Mail list logo
