Dave
Season's Greetings
How about at 0230 for six days begging tomorrow at
7034.8 KHz long path 500/16 MT63
73
Omar YK1AO
- Original Message -
From:
Dave
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 9:04
PM
Subject: [digitalradio]
Dave,
I would think that using signal detection techniques would solve that
issue. We have been experimenting with them lately and yes, there is
work to be done, but that is what this is all about.
Steve, k4cjx
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Bernstein" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Waterman, k4cjx" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not as confident about predicting the demise of Amateur radio as you are in your comments below. I have not predicted
My 12 year old son accidentally broke a pin on a PC monitor cable .
The cable is the type that is not detachable, it is hardwired to the
inside of the monitor, my local PC repair shops says replacment cables
are not sold. Does anyone here know if these PC monitor cable have a
common color
Trying to think how to handle that Andy, and I would simply cut around (not
through) the monitors cable at the far end, remove one pin at a time and
move that wire over to a new connector. You should be able to do that one
at a time, looking where the old pin was, and mathcing with the new one.
Hello Andy,
I have replaced monitor cables in the past.
Just get out a ohm meter and buzz the existing cable out and write
down on piece of paper the color for each pin.
Do the same thing on the new cable. Swap the cable out.
I found color coding different on the ones I have repaired.
Wire in
Yes, I agree.
Such techniques already exist, as you have pointed out, but are not
exploited by today's message passing software. To encourage the
deployment of these techniques, I am suggesting that protocols
failing to exploit them be confined to subbands, while protocols
that do exploit
Hi Andy, I would be more than happy to do some
looking around for you on that wiring sceme. I am disabled here so I have the
time. I need to know what type monitor and the make of it. Size is not too
important but , whatever information you can give will help to narroe the search
for
I can agree with that idea too Danny, very good
suggestion at least that way there would be no guessing. Robin n1zw
- Original Message -
From:
Danny Douglas
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 11:46
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio]
Many thanks for letting me join up. The looks like one of the more
knowledgeable groups for the use of all sort of didgital mode.
I am not as smart as I thought I was, when it come to setting up my
system.. Let me first give you a layout of what I am running.
Transiever: Yaesu FT100-D
Antenna:
-Jim, a common problem for a couple of my rookie friends was that
they were trying to transmit at the far edges of their radio's
passband, thus the low output. Make sure that in MixW the place you
are transmitting is around 1500 Hz (in the waterfall). That may fix
the problem. You can use
I Believe that your are very correct in that being one of the major problems
with newbies (and some oldbies as well). Peronally, I have checked my own
soundcards and find that I must set them around 1000 HZ, as if I get up as
high as 1500cy, they no longer work with full output.
I did a test with
+++ AA6YQ comments
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steve Waterman, k4cjx
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From k4cjx: What resists, persists. If I get a beam and amp and you
get a beam and amp, we are right back where we started, right? Best
to work it out as has been the case with every other
Today, I note that OLIVIA is plastered all over the Part 97.221 sub-
bands. Why would they use these frequencies? Because they have
obvoiously been cleaned out and left for the operations that are
pertinant to 97.221. Not good considering we have purposely crammed
ourselves in these spaces to
Thanks Andy.
Let me just add a thanks to the members of DigitalRadio for such
a good year also.
John, WØJAB
co-moderator
At 03:10 PM 12/31/05 -0500, you wrote:
Happy New Year to all on this group, thanks for a successful year in
discussing digital modes.
Thanks to John W0JAB for helping me
This contest requires Happy New Year in your native
language as part of the exchange, so
brown: phonetical transcription
AFRIKAANS
gelukkige nuwejaar
ALBANIAN
Gëzuar vitin e ri
ALSATIAN
e glëckliches nëies / güets nëies
johr
ARABIC
aam
Last night I was on 40 meters after loading my CQ tape
into the TD a 8 station answered. Here is where it all
started down hill. Since his mark tone was right on
frequency but the space tone was way out in the weeds
some place. It also seems that hit system did not send
a CR LF till about 100
- Original Message -
From: Marc Ziegler, W6ZZZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 8:30 PM
Subject: [RTTY] NCCC RTTY Roundup Practices - All Are Invited
NCCC RTTY Roundup Practices - All Are Invited
The NCCC invites you to participate in RTTY practice contests this
Interesting John, I am about 45 minutes drive from Fort Erie, I'd drive to
Waterloo for a $50 19 inch monitor, Yankee customs might be an issue though.
Andy K3UK
- Original Message -
From: John Lindsay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 31,
Craig N7OR wrote
I realize it is perfectly legal under current part 97 rules,
but I think it just aint hammin' . I am not aware
of any exclusive automatic band.
Hi Craig,
Ignorance is bliss. Happy New Year! :)
Bonnie KQ6XA
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Craig N7OR wrote
If I begin a live conversation on a frequency that is not
in use, but some group calling themselves a network has
designated it as their only possible frequency, then
tough you-know-what.
Hi Craig,
I see you are willing to time-share and cooperate fully with
the other
Sorry Bonnie, Im with him. My operating priviliges are listed on a chart on
my wall here. I dont see any place I cant go within the ham bands. Thats
why I worked and earned the Extra license. If I find a clear frequency, ask
twice if anyone is using it, and no one shows up, its mine until I
Bonnie-
This extract from your reply to Craig illustrates the WHOLE problem.
1. NO ONE is forcing you to operate anywhere- It is only your desire.
2.I have seen no compelling reason for ANY operation on Ham frequencies
that is done without an active operator.
Bill-W4BSG
expeditionradio wrote:
Danny,
I used to rely on Reuters' RTTY broadcast to get the football
results from the UK, sometimes had to resort to Presna Latina from
Cuba when HF conditions were poor.
Andy K3UK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Good grief, the news is still
Nope- if they are there I go elsewhere. I expect others to do the same. But
I cannot begin to count the times I have been there in a QSO when something
I couldnt copy came up on top of us and ruined it.
They can work on my freq all day, as long as I cant hear them and they
dont interupt my
Bonnie has clearly stated here that amateurs are free to disregard
band plans that they personally view as too restrictive. Given that
position, her call for a world wide band plan makes no sense at all.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dr. Howard S. White
Sorry, I meant to reference Bonnie's earlier post:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/message/12576
Its the following excerpt to which I'm referring:
The writers of bandplans that do not follow on-the-air activity
trends, with room for communications technology to thrive, should
not
27 matches
Mail list logo
