Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

 Listen during any rtty test, they go all the way to 14150 (legally).                         0 - Original Message - From: John Bradley To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 10:01 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic han

Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

 never hear RTTY there, always just pactor... and usually P3 - Original Message - From: Danny Douglas To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 8:44 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital If you use

Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

At 08:44 PM 1/15/06, you wrote: >If you use 14105 - 14110 your going to be bucking heads with rtty >ops. You might read Olivia thru that, but the rtty ops wont enjoy it. Most if not all RTTY operations is going to be between 14,080 - 85 to about 14,098. Of course we all should know that 14,100

Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

 If you use 14105 - 14110 your going to be bucking heads with rtty ops.  You might read Olivia thru that, but the rtty ops wont enjoy it.   - Original Message - From: John Bradley To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 9:39 PM Subjec

Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

 Excuse my ignorance, but why are we trying to use 14105 to 14110 for OLIVIA and the other modes then?   Why are we not down between 14073 and 14080, for example?   I am not up on the FCC rules, our country's regulations would not prohibit Olivia and the like in that segment. It doesn't m

Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

14.096Mhz and 14.098Mhz tim ab0wr On Sunday 15 January 2006 19:04, John Bradley wrote: > and where might those frequencies be? > - Original Message - > From: David Struebel > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 10:58 AM > Subject: Re: [digitalradio]

Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

and where might those frequencies be? - Original Message - From: David Struebel To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 10:58 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital John,You are grossly misinformed. Th

Re: [digitalradio] Curious about the software picture

Mel I for one have no clue what you are asking. At 04:41 PM 1/15/06, you wrote: >Hello, > >I'm just being curious, but which digital software is it ? > >Kind regards, Mel G0GQK > > > > > > >Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org > >Other areas of interest: > >The M

[digitalradio] Curious about the software picture

Hello, I'm just being curious, but which digital software is it ? Kind regards, Mel G0GQK Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/D

Re: [digitalradio] Almost an RTTY signal?

Danny, Absolutely correct! My point, though, was that we can report it, but the chances of anything getting down is virtually nil. 73 de Eric, KB6YNO - Original Message - From: "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 11:01 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio]

Re: [digitalradio] Almost an RTTY signal?

If its on 7.088 it is illegal in any region or country that are members of the ITU.  Its quite possible its a multiple of another freq which has gotten out of hand and is transmitting out of band.  Indeed, call the FCC and report such signals.  I have done so many times in the past and eve

Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

Please do not confuse the NTSD using the Winlink Classic program with the Winlink 2000 email system. All of the NTSD Winlink Classic stations I connect to stay within in the automatic sub-bands as laid out in FCC regulations, Part 97.221(b). These are: 14095-140995khz and 14100.5-14112khz. In fa

Re: [digitalradio] PSK Fest - 12/14/06

y have 9 qso in the digitalfest hi   y found not more there are menny stations but working not digitalfest ? 73 on4ccx - Original Message - From: Jerry To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 6:15 PM Subject: [digitalradio] PSK Fest -

Re: [digitalradio] Almost an RTTY signal?

This questions comes up from time to time over the last 25 - 30 years that I can recall and it always that same answer. Brazil government or military. Interesting that they did try to pass traffic last weekend but got blasted out by the contest. As you PKS'ers well know. John At 11:40 AM 1/15/

Re: [digitalradio] Almost an RTTY signal?

Bill,   Sounds like wide-shift RTTY, 850 hz split, 75 baud.  If it is military, then you have a guarantee that it's encrypted.  Can't say who's military it is.  Don't have crypto here at the house!   You can give the FCC a call.  There might be an outside chance that it might be U.S. military. 

[digitalradio] PSK Fest - 12/14/06

I did not participate in PSK Fest. But had six QSO's on Olivia and enjoyed nice chat QSO's. Seems the others felt as I did and are not contesters. For most QSO's 500Hz 8 Tones worked as well as 1000Hz 32 tones. 500Hz 8 tones "moves along" faster and takes less spectrum. 73, Jerry - K0HZI

Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital

John, You are grossly misinformed. The Winlink stations on the frequecies you list are Winlink 2000 stations handling e mail messages. NTSD operates almost exclusively in the small automatic control band segments. Dave WB2FTX John Bradley wrote: I would like to point out tha

Re: [digitalradio] need cluster testers

Andrew O'Brien wrote: > Thanks ...back to the drawing board > > Andy > > > On 1/14/06, *Jerry W* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Andy, > > Unable to connect, 0135 UTC > > Jerry - K0HZI > > On 1/14/06, obrienaj < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: [digitalradio] need cluster testers

Danny Douglas wrote: > > Nope, get same thing. nice blank screen. l > > - Original Message - > From: "obrienaj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 8:30 PM > Subject: [digitalradio] need cluster testers > > > >>If you have a chance to try connecting to >> >>

[digitalradio] Recruits needed to sift stardust

This might be easier than DXing for rare countries or looking at your waterfall for weak digital signals.   Andy K3UK       Recruits needed to sift stardust By Helen Briggs BBC News science reporter   Stardust has captured primeval dustMembers of the public are being asked

Re: [digitalradio] need cluster testers

Works Great at 13:54 1-15-06 Ron W4LDE obrienaj wrote: >If you have a chance to try connecting to > >Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org > >I would appreciate it. I am not sure I fixed the problem but I have >at least got outgoing things such as Echolink working whereas earlier >it was not succes

[digitalradio] PSK Comparison , MixW , MMVARI, PSK Core.

FYI   Andy K3UK-- Forwarded message --From: Joe Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Jan 14, 2006 11:47 PM Subject: [hamlogger] PSK ComparisonTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]FYII worked in the PSK Fest contest this weekend and used MixW and both engines in Logger32. The PSK Core dll copied better

Re: [digitalradio] Digitalradio DX Cluster New Address

Saludos, I can connect to the cluster every time I try. It is working perfectly. --  73, Flavio Padovani KP4AWX Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http

[digitalradio] New file uploaded to digitalradio

Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the digitalradio group. File: /7088VK2.wav Uploaded by : vk2qq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description : Almost an RTTY signal You can access this file at the URL: http://gro