Rich:
I should know the exact answer to this - an RF tap to pull a little
power off the transmit sig - but I'm not sure what device to
recomment.
Have you considered one of the imd meters available? I use the KK7UQ
IMD meter but an alternative is the PSKMeter. The KK7UQ IMD meter
gives me an LED
Yep, that was it. Aggrivation personafied.
- Original Message -
From: "mulveyraa2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 9:13 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: unknown garbage trashes QSO
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wr
A "cooling off period" appears to be needed.
Many, many, good posts in the last few days, much appreciated.
However some tempers appear frayed, so I have turned ON the moderation
requirement for ALL messages by ALL members. This will be just a
pause for a few hours to allow a period of refl
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There was only one station being heard on that frequency, the 6O
which had been there for quite some time. (And of course the ones
that never get the word and call him simplex when he is listening up
the band. Wha
I am interested in verifying that I am not over-driving PSK31. Is
there a simple signal conditioning interface to an oscilloscope input?
Thanks
Rich
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/
> These are dangerous times when enemies-without-borders
> are bend upon our destruction and care not for their
> own temporal well-being. No point in making ourselves
> easy targets.
bullshit!! it is perfectly obious to me,
that during ythe pst disaster dhs affiliates and tyheir minion
There was only one station being heard on that
frequency, the 6O which had been there for quite some time. (And of course
the ones that never get the word and call him simplex when he is listening up
the band. Whatever it was came up, and we immediately started loosing the
6O contacts he
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just lost a QSO with 6O0N due to some trash coming up on 7.0637
thru 7.0644. Can anyone identify what that junk is? Perfect example
of SSB and Digital modes on same freq, not compatable.
>
> Danny Douglas N7DC
I was on voice, split operation. 6O was transmitting that freq when this
buzz buzz came up. Probably Pactor, as I dont work it, and can only assume
it was of that type. He certainly didnt listen, nor ask using any other
mode, if the freq was in use.
- Original Message -
From: "John Bec
The whole bandwidth RM issue brings what I think is a philosophical
argument to Amateur Radio and it is probably a good time to put the
discussion in those very simple philosophical points of view.
On the one hand we have the Winlink, and email over HF radio camp,
which seem to view Amateur Radio
FYI
from about 2130Z, there were a number of VE and
European SSB stations on and about 7065, since the band was open and they can
legitimately
tx there.
As well there were a number of VE5,VE6 and VE7
stations in QSO, ( I was one of them) that meet regularly on 7065. about that
time of
right now there is CW and Pactor.
Are you on LSB or USB?
That would help.
At 06:21 PM 1/25/06, you wrote:
>I just lost a QSO with 6O0N due to some trash coming up on 7.0637 thru
>7.0644. Can anyone identify what that junk is? Perfect example of SSB
>and Digital modes on same freq, not compat
I just lost a QSO with 6O0N due to some trash
coming up on 7.0637 thru 7.0644. Can anyone identify what that junk
is? Perfect example of SSB and Digital modes on same freq, not
compatable.
Danny Douglas N7DCex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR
ET3USASV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB
Need a Digital mo
kd4e wrote:
>>2. during a declared emergency
>
>
> And then only for specific purposes as requested by
> a Homeland Security approved agency and properly
> documented.
>
> One does not want to open the floodgates every time
> there is a declared emergency somewhere.
>
> We have to remember tha
Which is why I didn't completely disagree with the 'no place', just
suggested it be slightly moderated to 'only a limited place'. :)
Tim Gorman wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 January 2006 04:47, Paul L Schmidt wrote:
>
>>How about changing "no place" to "only a limited place".
>>
>>For example, it's e
The Winlink 2000 team spokesperson has found improper user of the
Winlink 2000 system and those users have been banned from the system.
This is exactly the same as the issues with VHF packet radio BBS
systems. The regulations apply in the same way. The hams running the
system need to do some sp
> Where can I find MFSK8 mode specification?
>
> I mean MFSK8 mode of "Stream" software.
Hi Sergei,
MFSK8 (as featured in Stream) shares most of MFSK16 parameters. It was meant
to be the "slow" version of MFSK16.
What changes respect to MFSK16 is:
baud rate: 7.8125 baud (half as MFSK16)
tone s
Dave,
I will pick on your message, but what really triggered my comment is
my perception of the misunderstanding between "semi-automtic
operation" and "control". Too many comments here seem to display an
acceptance of a relationship between these terms.
Semi-automatic operation may a good term t
> Even though it has been said before, based on the comment below, it
> needs to be said again ... Winlink and Winlink 2000 and any other
> similar systems used on amateur radio ... do NOT have commecial value to
> those running such systems.
It is unknown if *users* are misusing Ham spectrum f
> Dave Bernstein wrote:
> After discussing this offline with Walt K5YFW, I would say that
> encryption on the amateur bands should only be permitted in two
> specific circumstances:
>
> 1. to control a remote device (e.g. a satellite)
Carefully documented -- I believe a FCC required log
of all
After discussing this offline with Walt K5YFW, I would say that
encryption on the amateur bands should only be permitted in two
specific circumstances:
1. to control a remote device (e.g. a satellite)
2. during a declared emergency
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.co
Again, as has been said before but some may not be aware of it ... this
technology has been developed by Rick, KN6KB. I have tested it out as
have many other beta testers of SCAMP and it works. It does not matter
what digital or analog mode is on the frequency since it is able to
detect modulat
Title: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Olivia frequencies
No such thing. It was for something like 30
or 60 minutes.
Think I got one back there somewhere.
Dnny
- Original Message -
From:
DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
To: 'digitalradio@yahoogroups.com'
Sent: Wednesday,
Even though it has been said before, based on the comment below, it
needs to be said again ... Winlink and Winlink 2000 and any other
similar systems used on amateur radio ... do NOT have commecial value to
those running such systems.
When anyone makes such claims, they lose much of their credi
Title: RE: [digitalradio] Re: New Mode proposal "Jamtor Iv"
I saw (in a video presentation...the Harris modem) one connected to a big TenTec, one connected to a Harris HF transceiver and one to a RACAL Shortwave radio. All were copying signals on differnet bands.
Walt/K5YFW
-Original
Title: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Olivia frequencies
Have you ever heard of the "Rag Chewer's Award?" Given to individuals who have a continuous 24 hour QSO?
Walt/K5YFW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Tim Gorman
Title: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Olivia frequencies
I heard the same sort of comment when SSB was new. "The SSB equipment cost so much that only rich hams can afford it." Now everyone has "it".
My only problem with P3 or any new mode is that as hams we should try to exploit COTS hardware. F
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 04:47, Paul L Schmidt wrote:
> How about changing "no place" to "only a limited place".
>
> For example, it's essential (*and currently legal*) for remote
> control of things like satellites.
>
> And it would be nice for emergency comms -- with the health
> privacy laws
How about changing "no place" to "only a limited place".
For example, it's essential (*and currently legal*) for remote
control of things like satellites.
And it would be nice for emergency comms -- with the health
privacy laws the way they are now, permission to pass encrypted
text between appro
29 matches
Mail list logo
