[digitalradio] Re: ARRL proposal removes baud rate limitations on HF

2006-02-10 Thread tg6124
Pactor I wasn't added until 1993. You don't need anything special on the computer to run it, even a dumb terminal will work fine. Since the latest version of rom (7.2 I think) is still selling along with an upgrade to the venerable pk232mbx to add dsp filtering and psk31 capability, I doubt if

[digitalradio] Subnotebooks

2006-02-10 Thread g3vfp
This is not a topic for digitalradio in particular, but to the use of a particular piece of equipment to serve it's purpose. Please do not follow this thread in the group. There maybe members interested in joining a new group dedicated to subnotebook ps's for ham radio. Here is the address if

[digitalradio] ARRL to file Encryption Petition with the FCC

2006-02-10 Thread Tim Gorman
The ARIL just got roundly criticized by the Amateur Radio community for its HF Internet petition with the FCC. Here comes the next installation - this time for VHF. Check out the following URL's: http://www.arrl.org/announce/board.html http://www.arrl.org/announce/reports-2006/january/ For

Re: [digitalradio] ARRL to file Encryption Petition with the FCC

2006-02-10 Thread Dr. Howard S. White
Of course, Tim is spreading his usual anti ARRL, Anti Winlink, Anti Change, Anti Internet and Anti Virtually Everything Else missinformation rants to make his point. The reason that the ARRL BOD voted UNANIMOUSLY to support encryption was due to practical real world experience during the

Re: [digitalradio] ARRL to file Encryption Petition with the FCC

2006-02-10 Thread Paul L Schmidt
Just because HIPAA doesn't require protection of data transmitted by hams or the Red Cross doesn't mean it shouldn't be protected, does it? Are we not free to do the right thing without being forced to do it? Sounds like another thread to get moved quickly over to the politics group. -ps Tim

[digitalradio] Re: ARRL to file Encryption Petition with the FCC

2006-02-10 Thread N6CRR
If we Hams want to play a role in EMCOMM then we need to be able to serve our Agencies requirments for confidentiality when all else fails... Harold; There’s a game I like to play, it’s called “What dog in the fight”? Your dog is very visable With your statement: “If we Hams want to

Re: [digitalradio] ARRL to file Encryption Petition with the FCC

2006-02-10 Thread Tim Gorman
Howard, On Friday 10 February 2006 19:23, Dr. Howard S. White wrote: Of course, Tim is spreading his usual anti ARRL, Anti Winlink, Anti Change, Anti Internet and Anti Virtually Everything Else missinformation rants to make his point. ROFL! So much attributing motive, Howard. Can you read my

Re: [digitalradio] ARRL to file Encryption Petition with the FCC

2006-02-10 Thread Tim Gorman
No, we are not free do use encryption on amateur radio. That is for a good reason. It is called self-policing. The minute the East Congaline ARES group decides to become an Internet provider and set up a network for the County EOC connecting them to the Sheriff's office and decides to encrypt

Re: [digitalradio] ARRL to file Encryption Petition with the FCC

2006-02-10 Thread Michael Keane K1MK
At 07:36 PM 2/10/06, Tim Gorman wrote: The ARIL just got roundly criticized by the Amateur Radio community for its HF Internet petition with the FCC. Here comes the next installation - this time for VHF. Check out the following URL's: http://www.arrl.org/announce/board.html

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL to file Encryption Petition with the FCC

2006-02-10 Thread Dr. Howard S. White
EMCOMM has always been thefirst reason for existence of HAM Radio. Sec. 97.1 Basis and purpose The rules and regulations in this part are designed to provide an amateur radio service having a fundamental purpose as expressed in the following principles: (a) Recognition and