[digitalradio] Re: MixW Setup for Kantronics KAM XL

2006-04-23 Thread Andrew O'Brien
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Herman D. Chandler \"Don\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello; > I am using MixW along with a Rigexpert interface for the digital modes.  I also have a Kantronics KAM XL and would like to know how to set up the macro's and so on, so that I can use MixW

[digitalradio] Working Between Signals Re: Study of PACTOR 20M Frequencies

2006-04-23 Thread expeditionradio
Hi Andy, I agree with you. It is much easier for everyone to cooperate. Mutual QRM can very easily be avoided by not operating keyboarding modes directly on top of known PMBO Winlink2000 Pactor frequencies, especially the most active ones on 20 meters with good propagation to your QTH. A

[digitalradio] Fwd: [MMTTY] New digitalradiomodes Yahoo eGroup

2006-04-23 Thread Andrew O'Brien
-- Forwarded message -- From: Thomas Giella KN4LF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Apr 23, 2006 11:06 PM Subject: [MMTTY] New digitalradiomodes Yahoo eGroup To: a Rig Expert eGroup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, a RSQ eGroup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, a MMTTY eGroup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, a N1MMLogger eG

[digitalradio] MixW Setup for Kantronics KAM XL

2006-04-23 Thread Herman D. Chandler \"Don\"
Hello; I am using MixW along with a Rigexpert interface for the digital modes.  I also have a Kantronics KAM XL and would like to know how to set up the macro's and so on, so that I can use MixW to operate the KAM XL in the packet, Pactor, and Amtor modes.  I need this primarily for my MAR

[digitalradio] Re: DominonEX 22 baud FEC

2006-04-23 Thread Bill McLaughlin
Hi Andy, Have played alot with DominoEX/FEC on 80/40/30 metershave found it to be very robust, especially considering its bandwidth.  Without the FEC it is marginal. Even at 22 baud with FEC enabled it does well (better than my typing)...I wish more would try it...I often switch from Olivia

[digitalradio] Study of PACTOR 20M Frequencies

2006-04-23 Thread Andrew J. O'Brien
I did a study of published PACTOR/WINKLINK 20 meter frequencies for known active stations. There are 76 separate  20 meter frequencies  (see below). If looking for a place to avoid the publish pactor frequencies... you might try   (Frequencies mentioned are "center" frequencies)   The

[digitalradio] Olivia Re: An experiment: CQ test

2006-04-23 Thread expeditionradio
Hi Jerry, Olivia 500/8 is not used as much for CQ as Olivia 500/16 and Olivia 1000/32 are. When using Olivia it helps to be exactly on one of the calling or working frequencies, otherwise your signal may blend into the background. For more info Check the website: http://hflink.com/olivia 73 Bo

[digitalradio] Re: Domino EX "Sprint" April 26 and 27.

2006-04-23 Thread Andrew O'Brien
You can find the Domino EX software in a number of software applications including the free Multipsk at  http://f6cte.free.fr/index_anglais.htm and also one at http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~coombedn/FILES/DominoEXj.zip Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynal

[digitalradio] Domino EX "Sprint" April 26 and 27.

2006-04-23 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I would like to stimulate a test of Domino EX for contesting, so would like to get a few people to test under a very short Sprint conditions. This  test contest would like to see how Domino EX compares to RTTY and PSK63 for contesting speed and reception. Please enter, and sumbmit comments,  eve

[digitalradio] DominonEX 22 baud FEC

2006-04-23 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I had an interesting Dominio Ex QSO today, using the default "11" baud rate setting in Multipsk. After switching to 16 we then tried 22 with FEC, this did very well for a 45 minute digital QSO over a 400 mile path on 40M in daylight. I have no idea what the conventions are for Olivia at this

Re: [digitalradio] MFSK/Olivia - sources released under GPL

2006-04-23 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
I sent the original sources I got from Pawel to Tomi and did the first on-the-air Olivia test with gMFSK.  There is another OM who has recently forked gMFSK and announced it on this list.   Getting those too back together would be a wiorthy goal as well. Leigh/WA5ZNU On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 5:56

[digitalradio] Re: An experiment: CQ test

2006-04-23 Thread Jerry W
I used PSK31, Olivia 8/500, Feld Hell on 20 and 30 meters yesterday April 22, 2006.  I think I may have chose the wrong day, conditions were very bad here on  20 meters.  I called CQ at various times on the three modes, not one answer.  Even tried to contact a station in AZ who usually is 599 he

[digitalradio] Tones from WLO ?

2006-04-23 Thread Andrew J. O'Brien
Anyone know what "mode" the tones from WLO are? I'm listening to their signal on 8420 (cw) , interspersed with their CW ID is a PACTOR sounding tone that looks like    The single tone in the picture is the CW id. Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Ot

Re: [digitalradio] MFSK/Olivia - sources released under GPL

2006-04-23 Thread Darren Long
Hi,Can we just compile this into the latest release of gMFSK, or isn't gMFSK built like that?Darren, G0HWWOn 22 Apr 2006, at 22:04, Pawel Jalocha wrote: It is my pleasure to annonce that the MFSK/Olivia source code is released under GPL and can be dowwnloaded from: http://homepage.sunrise.ch/mys