Re: [digitalradio] Re: Basic Question On Icom 706 and Rascal interface

2006-08-09 Thread chasm
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:34:23 -0500, KV9U <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Personally, I would prefer to control the PTT via the CI-V rather than a >separate control, but I have heard that some ICOM rigs (e.g., 706) may >not permit PTT via the CI-V as does 756 Pro series ICOMs. Perhaps some >others mo

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Basic Question On Icom 706 and Rascal interface

2006-08-09 Thread KV9U
It depends upon which specific Rascal model as there are several. Some will provide a USB connection to the computer for PTT and an audio interface. They do not appear to have the CI-V control so you would need additional hardware and another COM port for that if you wish to have more advanced

Re: [digitalradio] multi digital mode beacon

2006-08-09 Thread kd4e
> Andrew O'Brien wrote: > We are a "club" Preach it, brother! We are family! Giggle! Seriously, some times it is best to start something like this and prove its value. Then see if a org. will take it on and keep it going. Sometimes an individual or two or three determines to keep it going and

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Basic Question On Icom 706 and Rascal interface

2006-08-09 Thread chasm
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:30:02 -0700 (PDT), Lev Slutsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >HI there: > I've read your comments with interest. I own IC-706. > Could describe in modre detail what kind of cable I need ( and what is > key-word to search for them on ebay). I also interested what softtware is

[digitalradio] Re: Cabling Nightmare on Ham Street

2006-08-09 Thread Dave Bernstein
If you're willing to switch logging applications, DXLab interoperates with MixW, and includes a digital mode application called WinWarbler that will control your Pactor TNC. DXLab is free, and available via www.dxlabsuite.com . 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "H

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Basic Question On Icom 706 and Rascal interface

2006-08-09 Thread Lev Slutsman
HI there: I've read your comments with interest. I own IC-706. Could describe in modre detail what kind of cable I need ( and what is key-word to search for them on ebay). I also interested what softtware is required, Thanks you a lot in advance, Leo (AA2AH) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Basic Question On Icom 706 and Rascal interface

2006-08-09 Thread chasm
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:12:26 -0700, list email filter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >To answer your 706 specific question, all that is needed is a properly >connected serial (rs-232 or usb) to ttl interface that connects from >your computer (rs-232 or usb) to your radio (ttl) to do radio control.

[digitalradio] Re: Basic Question On Icom 706 and Rascal interface

2006-08-09 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I am aware that one does not need a Rascal , but since he has one I want to get him on the air with it. I think what you are saying is that with his Icom 706 MKII and his Rascal he is all set, and can do rig control in addition to basic functions. I will find out which of his two rigs he

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Basic Question On Icom 706 and Rascal interface

2006-08-09 Thread Joe Ivey
Andy, I do not think the Rascal supports CAT control for any radio. I have an older model here and it does not. It only consist of a PTT curcuit and the audio cables and transformers. I bought mine a few years ago to get on Echolink using a 2 meter FM rig. Here is the web site for the W1GEE in

Re: [digitalradio] multi digital mode beacon

2006-08-09 Thread kd4e
> About 6 years ago, Lionel (G3PPT) suggested the idea of digital mode > beaconing with the encouragement of Murray (ZL1BPU). > > Nino, (IZ8BLY) came up with the idea of several digital modes in parallel on > a single WAV file. A small group of us eventually used the method you > describe. >

Re: [digitalradio] Re: DigiKeyer

2006-08-09 Thread kd4e
I could use some clarification, please? I have read somewhere that folks have been unable to measure any discernible difference between external and internal sound cards. The article/post that I read stated that one would intuitively guess that an external sound card would reduce noise but that t

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Basic Question On Icom 706 and Rascal interface

2006-08-09 Thread chasm
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 18:06:17 -0400, "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >So, is the Rascal all that one would need if the radio was a Icom and >the Rascal had supplied cables? I am assuming that this is all the >person needs. The Rascal web page does not actually describe what is >inside

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Basic Question On Icom 706 and Rascal interface

2006-08-09 Thread Wayne Harrell- WD4LYV
Hello Chas Wayne in Georgia WD4LYV. I will be happy to communicate with you as I am running rascals here. You do not need the CI-V to operate the digital modes. This is for rig control not digital input. I will be happy to reply more if the person needs my input.. Wayne WD4LYV wd4lyv at s

Re: [digitalradio] Cabling Nightmare on Ham Street

2006-08-09 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I'm no Riblaster Pro expert but both Logger32 and MixW allow for control of an external TNC. What problems have you encountered ? Andy. Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ D

Re: [digitalradio] multi digital mode beacon

2006-08-09 Thread Andrew O'Brien
We are a "club" Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your gr

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Basic Question On Icom 706 and Rascal interface

2006-08-09 Thread Andrew O'Brien
So, is the Rascal all that one would need if the radio was a Icom and the Rascal had supplied cables? I am assuming that this is all the person needs. The Rascal web page does not actually describe what is inside a Rascal. I am familiar with "interfaces" that are simply line in/out cables with i

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Basic Question On Icom 706 and Rascal interface

2006-08-09 Thread KV9U
The CI-V port needs an interface between it and typically a computer COM port. This can be a fairly simple interface with a few transistors. Since COM ports are becoming obsolete, having a third part USB to CI-V interface is nice to have, but there are none that I would consider to be low in co

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Basic Question On Icom 706 and Rascal interface

2006-08-09 Thread list email filter
Chas, You've got it right. To do digital communications via software and a computer sound card, you need three basic connections (regardless of what radio you are using, though I suppose one of those could be optional). Setting aside the desirability to in some way isolate your computer and

Re: [digitalradio] multi digital mode beacon

2006-08-09 Thread Bill Turner
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 02:03:01 -0400, you wrote: >I'm game -- name the time and frequency and I'll put it all together. > >73, Tony KT2Q > REPLY SEPARATOR Good of you to offer Tony, but I think this should be sponsored by a club rather than an individ

[digitalradio] Re: Basic Question On Icom 706 and Rascal interface

2006-08-09 Thread schuetzen
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That same friend referenced in the Kenwood related message may use the > Icom 706 MKII with his Rascal interface (USB/serial). Does the Rascal > have the CI-V "thing" that Icom's require or does he need this in

[digitalradio] Cabling Nightmare on Ham Street

2006-08-09 Thread Harold Aaron
Hi all. I currently work soundcard modes through a RigBlaster PRO and mainly MixW 2. No problem here and everything works fine. Doing rig control and logging via EasyLog program through the RigBlaster com port. Works fine. One problem is that it is an either or situation - either MixW or t

Re: [digitalradio] Emission types

2006-08-09 Thread Rein Couperus
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > Gesendet: 08.08.06 15:39:24 > An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > Betreff: Re: [digitalradio] Emission types > > Hi, > > I'm interested in using gMFSK like this too, but for a different > reason. I built the HKJ variant