[digitalradio] Digipan 2.0 Sample Rate ??

2006-10-01 Thread bcpink
On my new computer I seem to be receiving everything up a few cycles. I have to Lock my Transmit at move my recieve location in the window. The manual says to change the sample rate. I'm not clear if I should be changing my TRANSMIT or my RECIEVE as well as by how much? Can anyone help? I

[digitalradio] Re: Problems with Windows XP and RASCAL interface to Mark V

2006-10-01 Thread Andrew O'Brien
-Which part of transmit does not work? Does the rig go in to Xmit mode but no digital audio is transmitted , or does the rig not even switch from receive to xmit? If the latter, I suspect the configuration of software and rig control, maybe the Rascal too. What software are you trying to

Re: [digitalradio] Digipan 2.0 Sample Rate ??

2006-10-01 Thread Mark Miller
Is your soundcard new too? You probably have a soundcard with drivers that don't quite have the same sampling rate for tx and rx. The way I handle this with MixW is I generate a tone and measure it on a frequency counter. I adjust the TX sampling rate until the frequency is correct. For

[digitalradio] Digital Voice today, anyone?

2006-10-01 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I will be calling CQ at the top and bottom each hour for most of today. I will use 14236 if it is clear with 14233 and 14239 as alternatives. Perhaps 7296 after 0100 UTC. I will send an autoCQ text message using WinDRM and switch to Digital Voice via WinDRM if the signal is good enough.

[digitalradio] Re: Digital voice and BPL

2006-10-01 Thread Andrew O'Brien
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is what I am hearing true? That BPL has no affect on digital voice! I'm too new at DV to know, but why would this be true? Interference is interference, right ? Andy K3UK Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Digital voice and BPL

2006-10-01 Thread kd4e
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is what I am hearing true? That BPL has no affect on digital voice! I'm too new at DV to know, but why would this be true? Interference is interference, right ? Andy K3UK I am going to attempt an explanation

[digitalradio] Re: First digital voice QSO !

2006-10-01 Thread jhaynesatalumni
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Windrm appears to only function under the proprietary MS version of windows. Have we exchanged one form of proprietary for another? Is there a compatible version for Apple and Linux? It appears to be working under WINE

[digitalradio] Re: First digital voice QSO !

2006-10-01 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I'm monitoring 7296 USB if anyone wants to give a try. Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy

[digitalradio] Re: First digital voice QSO !

2006-10-01 Thread jhaynesatalumni
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm monitoring 7296 USB if anyone wants to give a try. I was listening at 0100Z and heard ALE tones but so far nothing on DRM. Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of

Re: [digitalradio] Re: First digital voice QSO !

2006-10-01 Thread KV9U
I have been attempting to send some DRM signals with WinDRM but not hearing anything on 7296 USB. I also sent some USB analog voice as well. Time ending the tests was about 0155Z here in SW Wisconsin in the U.S. One of the questions that I have is how do you determine where to set your mike

[digitalradio] BPL-Busting Modes/Techniques

2006-10-01 Thread expeditionradio
BPL-Busting Modes/Techniques The Digital Voice formats presently in use by hams are not designed to be resistant to QRM from BPL (Broadband over Power Lines). The OFDM digital voice methods require a much higher S/N than SSB. In fact, most of our present digital and analog modes are not