[digitalradio] 7077 Slow Tones

2007-04-16 Thread Bill P.
Sorry, but I've looked around and cannot ID the mode I hear on 3577 and 7076, very slow tones, about 1 second each? Any help please ?? Bill k6acj psk31, mfsk, Olivia, etc

[digitalradio] Re: 7077 Slow Tones

2007-04-16 Thread Andrew O'Brien
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Bill P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, but I've looked around and cannot ID the mode I hear on 3577 and 7076, very slow tones, about 1 second each? Any help please ?? Bill k6acj psk31, mfsk, Olivia, etc I'm not sure about 3577 but ob 7076 it is

[digitalradio] JT65A and ARRL Field Day

2007-04-16 Thread jdh23462
After reading though the Bozo guide and the JT65 protocol, I am assuming that everyone is using WSJT as it would be set up for moon bounce or meteor scatter. Has anyone used it sending plain text? The reason I ask, I would like to use this as a demonstration mode for field day and could I

[digitalradio] TAIWAN in JT65A mode @ 14.076

2007-04-16 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Hi 144600 2 -27 2.7 -22 4 * CQ BX1AD PL04 1 0 73 de LA5VNA Steinar

[digitalradio] JT65A Slow decoding

2007-04-16 Thread g0azs_marc
Hello All I'm just getting into decoding some JT65A on 14076 and I seem to have a problem that's probably computer related... but I would appreciate some advice. My clock is sync'ed OK but at the end of a minute (and when I have even seen strong traces) it is 25 seconds into the next minute

Re: [digitalradio] JT65A Slow decoding

2007-04-16 Thread John Becker
The computer is very busy in this time frame. Creating a WAV file and other things. If your CPU is slow it will take a while. My dell 500 mhz some times goes to 10 seconds after the minute but never had it run that long. At 04:36 PM 4/16/2007, you wrote: Hello All I'm just getting into

[digitalradio] ATTN: ALL JT65 HF OPS

2007-04-16 Thread KT2Q
All: Please try to spread out when working JT65 on the HF bands. It is impossible to decode signals when they overlap. Remember that the transmit tones are fixed and will not change unless you change your dial frequency. Clicking on signals that are some X-hertz away from zero-beat in the

[digitalradio] Fwd: [tapr-announce] TAPR PSR Needs Articles for Dayton Hamvention Issue

2007-04-16 Thread Mark Thompson
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 5:48 PM Subject: [tapr-announce] Write Now for PSR I say again: The editorial staff of TAPR's quarterly newsletter Packet Status Register (PSR) is busily preparing the next issue (the Dayton Hamvention

Re: [digitalradio] JT65A Slow decoding

2007-04-16 Thread Darrel Smith
Hi Marc With my Compaq Deskpro 731Mhz usually decodes at 6 seconds after the minute with nothing else open.If I have other apps open it could be a long as 10-11 secs. I just double click the callsign and hit auto very quickly and I still make the contacts. Darrel On 16-Apr-07, at 2:36

[digitalradio] 10mw QSO JT65

2007-04-16 Thread KT2Q
All: Managed to work Justin (N5BO) with 10mw on 20 meters. Justin's report was -23db so it would seem there was some room to go even lower. There's no doubt that you could microwatt with this mode under ideal conditions -- amazing! 04/17 02:27 021900 2 -23 0.08 4 # N5BO KT2Q FN30

[digitalradio] Re: JT65A Slow decoding

2007-04-16 Thread Bill McLaughlin
Hi, Also go to the decode psuedo-button and disble deepsearch options...might miss a weak sign in the deepsearch file but will speed up the decodes... 73 Bill N9DSJ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Darrel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Marc With my Compaq Deskpro 731Mhz usually

[digitalradio] Re: 10mw QSO JT65

2007-04-16 Thread Bill McLaughlin
Saw that Tonyseems like 2.5 mw would work although with little margin! 73 Bill N9DSJ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KT2Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All: Managed to work Justin (N5BO) with 10mw on 20 meters. Justin's report was -23db so it would seem there was some room to go

Re: [digitalradio] Re: 10mw QSO JT65

2007-04-16 Thread KT2Q
Saw that Tonyseems like 2.5 mw would work although with little margin! 73 Bill N9DSJ I think your right Bill. That would have weakend the signal another 6 db. I would guess JT65 could handle that if the band noise was low enough. Need to try that again. Tony KT2Q - Original