> Dave, AA6YQ wrote:
> Anyone know how many amateur QSOs are typically
> initiated each month?
Why not try it and see?
73 Bonnie KQ6XA
>>>AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio"
wrote:
> Andy K3UK wrote:
> Where all this leaves ALE, is another issue !
> Just rambling, 73 de Andy K3UK
Hi Andy,
As the defacto global standard for initiating and sustaining HF comms, ALE
isn't affected b
> Andy K3UK wrote:
> Where all this leaves ALE, is another issue !
> Just rambling, 73 de Andy K3UK
Hi Andy,
As the defacto global standard for initiating
and sustaining HF comms, ALE isn't affected
by "ham radio digital flavor of the month" :)
When linked, simply use whatever mode suits
I have a friend who years ago twisted my arm to get me into
Clover. Back then the original Clover modem, the PCI-4000
was arguably more costly than the SCS modems in constant dollars.
We used to keep skeds and use it conversationally - he seemed
to really enjoy the quasi-full-duplex operation wher
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "kh6ty" wrote:
>
> > I assume that many people know already, but just in case there are
> > some that do not, WINMOR will not be a digital mode that your can
> use
> > for keyboard "chats" or QSOs, it is intended to allow you to connect
> > to a HF Radio Messag
I suspect that they are NOT JT65A signals , what frequency?
Andy K3UK
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Kim wrote:
> Does anyone know what's going on with JT65A? I'm seeing signals now that are
> 400 hz wide and I am unable to decode them with WSJT6 software.
>
> Kim AB7JK
>
> _
Does anyone know what's going on with JT65A? I'm seeing signals now that are
400 hz wide and I am unable to decode them with WSJT6 software.
Kim AB7JK
Andy brings up some very good points.
I concur that WINMOR, as used with Winlink 2000, will engender a great
deal more interest in using ham radio for e-mail. I know that I plan to
use this myself, especially building it into public service/emergency
communication. We have no way of accessing a
> I assume that many people know already, but just in case there are
> some that do not, WINMOR will not be a digital mode that your can
use
> for keyboard "chats" or QSOs, it is intended to allow you to connect
> to a HF Radio Message Server and unload your email formatted
messages
> .
> Q Why no
> I assume that many people know already, but just in case there are
> some that do not, WINMOR will not be a digital mode that your can
use
> for keyboard "chats" or QSOs, it is intended to allow you to connect
> to a HF Radio Message Server and unload your email formatted
messages
> .
Q Why n
The new (March 2009) issue of Communications of the ACM has an
article by Guruswami and Rudra, "Error Correction up to the
Informaton-Theoretic Limit" that may be important. I'm not
enough of a theoretician to say whether it is or isn't.
Jim W6JVE
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien"
wrote:
> I assume that many people know already, but just in case there are
> some that do not, WINMOR will not be a digital mode that your can use
> for keyboard "chats" or QSOs, it is intended to allow you to connect
> to a HF Radio Message
Andy
Let me know what you think of it.
Not having a 2M packet network near I missout on
a lot of things. Anything via airmail / winlink has
got to be by HF from this station.
John
13 matches
Mail list logo
