g4ilo writes:
>
> But why are you all so worked up over this? It is the USA not
> Soviet Russia, you aren't going to end up in Siberia are you?
The late J Edgar Hoover, director of the FBI, used to exile FBI agents
he disliked to Alaska, which was as close to Siberia as he could send
the
James French writes:
> Can it be 'justified' to 'clog up' a new band with allowing ANY digital
> mode,
> and I am also including digitized voice into this, just to have it be there?
> Why not use what is already staged and developed and on the bands that
> already
> have the allocations?
Rick Ellison writes:
...
> This just makes no sense to me why you would push Pactor III on a
> channelized frequency setting..
A good question: I was thinking of sending in a comment on that NPRM,
recommending that instead of authorizing only PSK-31 and Pactor-III,
that the FCC instead permit a
Ed G writes:
>
> Using your same logic below, it could well be determined that hams
> who partake regularly in 75M evening nets, or even regular QSO, etc,
> should take their conversations to FCC Part D Citizen's band, or other
> service , because those communications on a reg
Adding to Skip's remarks, I will point out it is considered almost an
indecency among the daily-position-report hams to mention 97.113(a)(5)
of the FCC rules, which states:
(a) No amateur station shall transmit:
...
(5) Communications, on a regular basis, which could reasonably be
furn
I don't know whether that applies to MSIE.
Sometimes convenience and safety are conflicting values.
73 DE KW6H (ex-AE6VW), Chris Jewell
I didn't complain either, but after about 5 or so of his messages I
added this to my .procmailrc:
# advertisements in various Y! ham-radio mailing lists
*From: .*wb9...@yahoo.com
/dev/null
73 de kw6h, ex-ae6vw
Chris Jewell
Oops! That .procmailrc rule should read ...
:0 :
*Received: from .*72\.20\.12[14]\.[0-9]+
/dev/null
Sorry about the missing period.
--
73 DE KW6H (ex-AE6VW), Chris Jewell
l.net
forwarding service, which passes my firewall.
73 DE KW6H (ex-AE6VW), Chris Jewell
he
FCC subbands-by-bandwidth NPRM, WL2K sucks|rocks, automatic busy
detection for bots "should is mandatory"|"is infeasible", etc, but I'm
not sure I'm not confabulating here. :-)
73 DE KW6H (ex-AE6VW)
--
Chris Jewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] PO Box 1396 Gualala CA USA 95445
affic by cryptographir means, but I don't see a lot
of evidence of that yet.
It also may be that, say, on 2M and above, where F-layer propagation
is unknown, hams could be permitted the use of crypto without
disturbing international agreements too much.
--
73 DE KW6H (ex AE6VW), Chris Jewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wish it
were otherwise, but it's not. We need regulation by bandwidth only,
but that proposal seems to be stalled. :-(
--
Chris Jewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ex-ae6vw) Gualala CA USA 95445
h we know is too slow.
(120 chars/sec) / (6 chars/word) = 20 words / second (not per minute)
20 x 60 = 1200 words/minute.
Besides, while I don't know a lot about AX.25, I'm pretty sure that
X.25, from which AX.25 is derived, is synchronous (no start or stop
bits).
--
73 DE KW6H (ex-AE6
hed in the FR until
15 November, and took effect on 15 December, despite the fact that the
October announcement included the full text of the adopted changes,
unlike Friday's press release.
I'll be surprised if the effective date is earlier than 1 February.
--
73 DE KW6H, ex-AE6V
e rules
do not say what in fact they plainly do say.
The terms "semiautomatic" and "fully automatic" are mere shorthand:
that those terms do not appear in the regs is not germane to the
discussion.
--
73 DE KW6H (ex-AE6VW) Chris Jewell Gualala CA USA
tering
too much, since they grow towards each other as needed.
--
73 de kw6h, ex-ae6vwChris Jewell, Gualala CA USA
he top of the band, rather with the
experimenters and narrow-mode operators in between.
Comments?
--
73 DE KW6H, ex-AE6VW, Chris Jewell Gualala CA USA
for
example, Region 2 hams stopped using 3.8 to 4.0 MHz, because in Region
1 that spectrum belongs variously to the fixed, land mobile, aero
mobile, and broadcast services, with no hams allowed. That's not
going to happen.
--
73 DE KW6H, ex-AE6VWChris JewellGualala CA USA
expeditionradio writes:
> Wow. It appears that the FCC has actually redefined "Data" below 30MHz
> at less than 500Hz... "data" in the common way that 99% of hams send
> data using digital modes on computers and ham transceivers.
>
> I've often said that the antiquated content-based FCC rule
difference in a meter reading.
73 de KW6H, ex AE6VW
--
Chris Jewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gualala CA USA 95445
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.co
to the late Richard Mitchell's
essay "Yet Another Losing Season":
http://www.sourcetext.com/grammarian/newslettersv09/9.6.htm.
It makes no mention of ham radio, but if you read it, you'll see why I
thought of it in this context.
-- 73 DE KW6H, ex AE6VW Chris Jewell
Need a
ut
pipelined packets.
--
73 DE AE6VW Chris JewellGualala CA USA
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan pol
e top of my head: if anyone has already been thinking
more deeply about this and has better suggestions, by all means offer
them. I'm an old computer geek but a new ham: I'm happy to learn
about either computers or radio from anyone who can improve my
understanding.
--
73 DE AE6VW Chris
don't know whether there is a
comparable sysctl variable in Linux, or whether you can build a custom
kernel that uses a shorter scheduling quantum, or what.
--
73 DE AE6VW, Chris Jewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gualala CA USA
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other
E and Open5066 are
examples, though I don't yet know much about the latter, and so have
no opinion as to whether it will prove fit for ham use. Obviously,
the people working on it think it is, and they know much more about it
than I, so I'm hopeful.
--
73 DE AE6VW Chris JewellGu
t any laptop has a COM4 port.
73 DE AE6VW, Chris
--
Chris Jewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band
dance) and the equation for input impedance, instead of just
taking my guess that it'll work okay.
73 DE AE6VW, Chris
--
Chris Jewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PO Box 1396 Gualala CA 95445 707-884-9406
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas
kd4e writes:
> Hmmm. Sounds as though if I wish to cover all modes I
> will need something more than a sound card as some of
> them need more interface help than others!
Perhaps not, since you're a Linux user. Although I haven't tried it
myself yet, I *think* you'll find that hfterm on Linux
ay harbor
disabling bugs that could get someone killed, or at least could
prevent them being saved or assisted. In such a context, a timebomb
is certainly an unnecessary feature. Software development decisions
that are acceptable for games or business software can get people
killed when used
29 matches
Mail list logo
