I have received the email below from Yann Voumard. If you are able to
assist him, particularly with specific answers to his questions about
the AX.25 parameters I am sure he would appreciate it.
Please respond to him DIRECTLY at: yann.voum...@epfl.ch
He is not a member of this group.
Scott/K6
Hi Andy,
Here is a MixW/TS2000 macro that will center the selected signal and
then reduce the TS2000 bandwidth to about 100 cycles (lines beginning
with a semicolon are comments and can be removed).
; move RX to 1000 (center of filter bandwidth)
; move TX to same place
; turn "packet filter
I've used "Fat Cow" for a couple of years with no problems. I think
they have a few site builder options but I've never tried one.
Scott ( k6ix.net )
Bert Morton wrote:
> I am looking for suggestions for a reliable and reasonable web hosting
> company to host a simple website for me.
>
> It
you have to look at their actions, not their words.
The ARRL is not dedicated to the benefit of Ham Radio, it is dedicated
to the benefit of the ARRL.
Scott Hill/K6IX
W4AGA wrote:
> Setting aside the misplaced sense of entitlement in that letter,
> there's this from http://www.ar
Andy, if you don't get a copy somewhere else send me an email with
your snail mail address, and I will send you the issue.
Scott/K6IX
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
> I hate to admit this, but I forgot to renew my ARRL membership and
> have missed the latest QRZ Magazine. I am told that the latest
> edit
History.txt file in program folder lists changes. Several changes to
the log file display, new xceivers supported, etc.
Scott/K6IX
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
> -Anyone notice any major changes? Seems about the same to me.
>
> Andy K3UK
>
>
>
>
> Announce you
Thank you Andy. Now you better duck. You have maligned the sacred
cow of ham radio.
Scott/K6IX
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
> FYI, my hospital OWNS the ham equipment deployed at the facility.
> ARES/RACES provides operators but we retain ownership of anything we
> paid for out of Govt grants. I insi
I just downloaded a trial of MixW and there was nothing disturbing the
audio. I do NOT think it is because of MixW being a trial version.
Scott/K6IX
Chuck Mayfield - AA5J wrote:
> Brett Owen Rees VK2TMG wrote:
>
>> Hi Chuck,
>>
>> The attachment worked ok here for me. The sound seems to be say
160, 80, 40 meters with almost any kind of wire/dipole antenna. We
have a weekly regional net in the Sierra foothills in California on 80
meters, and never fail to copy everyone on the net.
Scott/K6IX
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
> My entry in to amateur radio was via 10 meters and the quest for DX,
On both of my receivers (ICOM 736 and Kenwood TS-2000), with AGC off,
reducing the RF gain has almost exactly the same effect as reducing
the soundcard receive level.
My reading of the article is that turning down the RF gain will reduce
the "distortion" on a strong signal caused by either the
get a bad IMD report from someone. If your signal is very strong into
his receiver you might want to ask him to turn down his RF gain and
take another reading.
Scott/K6IX
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
> On 9/17/06, Scott Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
Where did you see that statement Andy? The thing to turn down until
you have no AGC is the audio drive from the soundcard, NOT the RF
gain. Nothing wrong with turning down the RF gain if you want to run
lower power, but that will not get rid of splatter caused by the AGC.
Scott/K6IX
Andrew O
Google on "download manager" and find a program which will monitor the
download and restart it if necessary without going clear back to the
beginning. I used the one from Netscape until I got DSL. Almost all
of them are free.
Scott Hill, K6IX
doc wrote:
>> after a two h
Seems like I see most RTTY on 14.080 - 14.090. Not much above that
except contests.
Scott, K6IX
F.R. Ashley wrote:
>
>>On 20 meters automated data stations are given from 14.089 to 14.099
>>and 14.101 to 14.112 MHz depending on the signals actual spectrum used
>>by the signal.
>
>
>
worked fine for me.
Scott, K6IX
Danny Douglas wrote:
> Hmmmthe url comes up in ie with an address "about:blank" and just sits
> there with a blank page.
> Danny
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Andrew J. O'Brien
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, November
I think you fixed it Andy. Good Job!
Andrew J. O'Brien wrote:
> Good detective work Scott. I re-set this, it was on MODERATOR for some
> reason. It now says MEMBERS...Let me know if this fixes the problem
> - Original Message -----
> From: Scott Hill
>
t, this is exactly the
behavior you get when you go:
Management>Messages>Posting&Archives(edit)>Archives Options
and click on the "Moderator" radio button. I know you are an
experienced moderator, but Yahoo makes it very difficult and confusing
to find and set all the o
17 matches
Mail list logo