Thanks for the info Bonnie, I was hoping that region 1 and 2 would now share
the same narrow band mode segment.
What is now happening is that many of the narrow band mode operators in region
2 are moving in to the segment suggested by the region 1 band plan. Maybe
region 2 will make a change. I
Thanks for the info Bonnie, I was hoping that region 1 and 2 would now share
the same narrow band mode segment.
What is now happening is that many of the narrow band mode operators in region
2 are moving in to the segment suggested by the region 1 band plan. Maybe
region 2 will make a change. I
Is there a group working on a new band plan for 40 M?
If so, we need to be sure the digital community has input.
Are the international SSB stations going to move from the 7060 through 7100
frequency range? If so, I would like to see an arrangement as on 20 M.
Eric - K9NP
Dear Andy,
Of the four applications you listed I only care about the "chats". I
think the question should ask by bandwidth. Here is what I think:
Contestia 500/16 for 500 Hz *
OLIVIA 1000/32 for 1 KHz
MFSK 16 for approx 250 Hz
Qpsk 31 for 100 Hz
* Here the choice is made for Contestia ove
Rick,
I have had amazing results on 80M with Olivia 500/16. With QRN crashes
to 10 over nine, I was got near perfect print from a station in Florida
that normally would run at S 7. True, the speed is a bit slow but a
greater speed is provided with Contestia which I have used but have not
ye
Read the rest of the ARRL announcement. The FCC will make the freqs
from 3585 -3600 Khz available for automatic stations.
Eric - K9NP
Thanks for the suggestions. It would be help full to know where all
the CW nets are to move. There must be someone that is coordinating
their the movement. Right now most of the digital action on 80M is
between 3580 to 3585. And, this might be just the place to stay. I
have not heard any
Mel, I had a similar problem when I installed a new computer. It
was RF Feedback. I had to put audio isolation tranformers in both
audio lines. Your truly, Eric - K9NP
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Mel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I was hoping that some of th
Thanks Mark for the info:
To me here, is the rub! From the report:
"Resolving two issues that have been hanging fire, the EC's
proposals would permit semi-automatic control (ie, with a control
operator at the querying station) throughout the amateur HF bands.
Sumner says that while
Let us think ahead. It looks to me the US rules will be changed so
that digital data operations will be allowed in segments of the HF
bands now used for phone operations. Most digital operators I am
sure will avoid using the phone frequencies for digital to digital
contacts except for the
10 matches
Mail list logo
