Alan Barrow wrote:
> Yes, I understand "it works". FBB works OK on HF because once you are
> logged in, it's not that interactive. But you still have 2-3 turnarounds
> before you send the initial message, etc.
FBB protocol has a feature I find very valuable: the Z-modem style
resume. JNOS had no
You are right in that the likely solution would be SCS and Pactor3.
The only other thing that we have tried is RFSM8000, developed by Dimitri ,
which has a email gateway built into it, is ARQ and runs on soundcard
Nobody in the US is using this on the ham bands at least since it does not
co
Jose A. Amador wrote:
> Based on what I know, for SMTP, JNOS may be an option at less than 300
> baud, i.e., 100-110 baud or PAX, using MultiPSK as "soundcard modem".
>
> I have not tested any of it yet. I have had no time and possibilities to
> test it so far.
>
> JNOS can use FBB compression or
John Bradley wrote:
> "ARES has responded with a command unit which has HF data capability. This
> could include a WIFI router so that laptops could be included from the local
> EOC. This command unit would work back into an EOC with data and internet
> connections. ARES would be tasked with passin
Based on what I know, for SMTP, JNOS may be an option at less than 300
baud, i.e., 100-110 baud or PAX, using MultiPSK as "soundcard modem".
I have not tested any of it yet. I have had no time and possibilities to
test it so far.
JNOS can use FBB compression or LZW compressed SMTP on any of it
" For several reasons we did not emulate the full forwarding syntax of the
BBS world, as it really starts to increase the scope as you get into "store
& forward". Once you accept a message, you own it, including communicating
failure back to the initiating session. Big responsibility. So by desig
