- Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires,
911"
- Original Message -
From:
F.R.
Ashley
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 3:14
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL proposal
removes baud rate limitations on HF
- Original
- Original Message -
From:
Dr. Howard S. White
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 5:28
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL proposal
removes baud rate limitations on HF
Which is why they developed Time Division
- Original Message -
From:
Tim Gorman
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 12:35
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL proposal
removes baud rate limitations on HF
On
Thursday 02 February 2006 01:54, Dr. Howard S. White
wrote:>> an
On Thursday 02 February 2006 01:54, Dr. Howard S. White wrote:
>
> and I suspect that several spread spectrum QSO's could share the same
> bandwidth...
>
> making for much more efficient band utilization .and less QRM
> __
> Howard S.
Original Message -
From:
Nino Porcino
(IZ8BLY)
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 7:58
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL proposal
removes baud rate limitations on HF
Rick KV9U wrote:> Although you could
theoretically go to much h
I read your pdf file
www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/techchar/Chip64.pdf
but much of it was over my non-engineer's head.
Is your representation of Chip64 that it can handle
keyboard to keyboard communications under weak signal/
high noise conditions and still permit and tolerate
a traditiona
Rick KV9U wrote:
> Although you could theoretically go to much higher baud rates, [...]
> would it be practical to do so?
>> Is anyone else on here concerned that the ARRL bandwidth regulation
>> proposal removes all baud rate limitations on signals in the HF
>> bands and 2 meters?
while traditi
Although you could theoretically go to much higher baud rates, within a
3500 Hz bandwidth, than the current 300 baud maximum, would it be
practical to do so?
We already know that 300 baud is way too fast for most HF conditions.
Which is why 300 baud packet has such a poor throughput unless
con
YES - IT IS A PROBLEM
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 11:41 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ARRL proposal removes baud rate limitations on HF
> Is anyone else on here concerned that the ARRL bandwidth
Is anyone else on here concerned that the ARRL bandwidth regulation proposal
removes all baud rate limitations on signals in the HF bands and 2 meters?
The only limitation will be the bandwidth limitation that will cap the baud
rate.
Removal of 97.307(f) limitations means we will see 3500 baud
10 matches
Mail list logo
