On Saturday 11 February 2006 12:24, Paul L Schmidt wrote:
>
> In general, though, it seems that there are a lot of folks out there
> who think it's best to penalize the entirety of society because a
> small segment *MIGHT* do something wrong.
Not allowing encryption of messages on amateur radio w
ep them to
official circuits only. They, quite frankly, are not emergencies. That
time has already passed for the victims.
Danny
- Original Message -
From: "KV9U" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL to file Enc
Tim Gorman wrote:
> No, we are not free do use encryption on amateur radio. That is for a good
> reason. It is called "self-policing".
As has already been pointed out, the subject is moot anyway, since the
information was quoted out of context.
In general, though, it seems that there are a lo
Like many hams, I have been unsure of what direction would be best for
amateur radio when it comes to encryption. At one time I was swayed some
by the Winlink 2000 promoters that maybe this should be done, but after
serious consideration, the long term considerations make it problematic
to allo
On Friday 10 February 2006 22:51, Dr. Howard S. White wrote:
> We tried Part 15 many variations of 802.11 type solutions and they just
> do not work ... Our terrain is far too mountainous and varied for reliable
> line of sight..
Really? And you think 2m, 70cm, and higher bands are any less li
orman
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 6:37
AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL to file
Encryption Petition with the FCC
Yep, I just plain screwed up. I apologize to everyone on
the list. Mr. Bodson of the Roanoke Division seems to have shown
Yep, I just plain screwed up. I apologize to everyone on the list.
Mr. Bodson of the Roanoke Division seems to have shown exceptional judgement.
I would note that the vote was NOT unanimous. Do you know how YOUR Director
voted?
tim ab0wr
On Saturday 11 February 2006 00:24, Michael Keane K1MK
At 07:36 PM 2/10/06, Tim Gorman wrote:
>The ARIL just got roundly criticized by the Amateur Radio community
>for its HF
>Internet petition with the FCC. Here comes the next installation - this time
>for VHF.
>
>Check out the following URL's:
>http://www.arrl.org/announce/board.html
>http://www.ar
""Ham Antennas Save Lives - Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires,
911"
- Original Message -
From:
Tim Gorman
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 7:45
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL to file
Encryption Petition with the FCC
H
No, we are not free do use encryption on amateur radio. That is for a good
reason. It is called "self-policing".
The minute the East Congaline ARES group decides to become an Internet
provider and set up a network for the County EOC connecting them to the
Sheriff's office and decides to encryp
Howard,
On Friday 10 February 2006 19:23, Dr. Howard S. White wrote:
> Of course, Tim is spreading his usual anti ARRL, Anti Winlink, Anti Change,
> Anti Internet and Anti Virtually Everything Else missinformation rants to
> make his point.
ROFL! So much attributing motive, Howard. Can you read m
Just because HIPAA doesn't require protection of data transmitted
by hams or the Red Cross doesn't mean it shouldn't be protected, does it?
Are we not free to do the right thing without being forced to do it?
Sounds like another thread to get moved quickly over to the politics
group.
-ps
Tim Go
italradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 4:36
PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ARRL to file
Encryption Petition with the FCC
The ARIL just got roundly criticized by the Amateur Radio
community for its HF Internet petition with the FCC. Here comes the next
installation - th
The ARIL just got roundly criticized by the Amateur Radio community for its HF
Internet petition with the FCC. Here comes the next installation - this time
for VHF.
Check out the following URL's:
http://www.arrl.org/announce/board.html
http://www.arrl.org/announce/reports-2006/january/
For thos
14 matches
Mail list logo
