Agreed. FEC is one of the big adventages that pactor has over packet on
HF links.
José, CO2JA
---
Rud Merriam wrote:
> More to the point it shouldn't be done. If such a large scale upgrade
> were to take place a modern robust protocol should be put into place.
> Something with good FEC, for
3/06/2008 11:51:11 a.m.
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] AX25 Protocol group
.
<>
work.net/>
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Moore
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 6:17 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] AX25 Protocol group
Actually, I suspect that it will be nearly impossible to do. Given
Actually, I suspect that it will be nearly impossible to do. Given the number
of systems that can't be upgraded without all new hardware (not everybody is
going to go for that).
Thx for the headsup on that!
Jeff M -- KE7ACY
- Original Message -
From: Phillip
Hi Jeff,
Hi Jeff,
If this is a re write of the AX25 protocol and I understand
that 2.2 is there in the wing but hasn't been adopted
this will impact all AX25 software / firmware world wide
That is why I have asked the question ..
If the above is correct it will be one huge task..
73 Phill
Perfect! Just as the US is moving back to AX.25 packet technology for Emcomm
purposes, people are planning on "shutting down" and making wholesale changes
to the AX.25 protocol. Brilliant!
Hopefully, it will only affect the VK crowd.
Jeff Moore -- KE7ACY
ARES
- Original Message -
I am sending this to all groups just incase this is NOT a rumour. It was
posted to Packet @ WW
the apprsig message bounced ..
---Original Message---
From: Phillip
Date: 2/06/2008 9:50:59 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AX25 Protocol group
Hi,
I have heard that the above g
