On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:52:37 -0500
Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you say, everyone is a bit different as to where their waterfall
pointer lies on a digital signal. It is much better to just spot
the actual freq where the audio signal comes out on the waterfall.
I.E. 14.0731.
If it had just been for willful interference, I would agree, but the
undertone of not following the bandplan was pretty alarming to me.
Anyone can claim interference if you have voice modes in a CW area since
you can not filter out a wide mode that has frequencies spread out and
that will
]
- Original Message -
From: Andrew J. O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 6:38 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Clarification : Establishing digital calling/beacon
frequencies
Just to clarify my original point...
I'm looking to establish
Danny Douglas wrote:
I have used Olivia, Throb, PSK63, Hell, MFSK all successfully on the
low end just below the normal PSK freqs on 20 meters. It would seem
to me the best place on all bands, using the low end of normal PSK
frqs, where people would notice you. Early on, in each of
upload to LOTW
or hard card.
moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Andrew J. O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 6:38 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Clarification : Establishing digital calling/beacon
frequencies
How about using PSK31 as the baseline and then transmit any other
digital mode a kHz or so up from the highest PSK31 signal that is on at
that time?
That is pretty much what I do on 80, 40, and 20.
I would very much like a spot frequency to operate on for 30 meters
which seems grossly
, December 21, 2006 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Clarification : Establishing digital
calling/beacon frequencies
How about using PSK31 as the baseline and then transmit any other
digital mode a kHz or so up from the highest PSK31 signal that is on at
that time?
That is pretty much what I
It seems to me that the IARU Region 2 bandplan should at least be
consulted as part of the subject process..
See http://www.iaru-regionii.org/Region_2_HF_Band_Plan.html.
73 de AA5J
Danny Douglas wrote:
As to the 160 meter band, I was taken aback by your comment about
operating
digital
: [digitalradio] Clarification : Establishing digital
calling/beacon frequencies
It seems to me that the IARU Region 2 bandplan should at least be
consulted as part of the subject process..
See http://www.iaru-regionii.org/Region_2_HF_Band_Plan.html.
73 de AA5J
Danny Douglas wrote:
As to the 160
Danny,
The ARRL bandplan shows Digital Modes to be 1.800 - 1.810. They also
have an Experimental modes area at the top of the band from 1.995 -
2.000 in the Beacon bandplan area:
http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/bandplan.html
I came across some information this week that really
: Thursday, December 21, 2006 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Clarification : Establishing digital
calling/beacon frequencies
Danny,
The ARRL bandplan shows Digital Modes to be 1.800 - 1.810. They also
have an Experimental modes area at the top of the band from 1.995 -
2.000 in the Beacon
Just to clarify my original point...
I'm looking to establish a suggested calling frequency for ALL digital modes
except CW, PSK31, RTTY, SSTV , PACTOR , and ALE(data ALE).
My suggestion is that members of this list utilize a common frequency to call
CQ and/or use attended beacon features
12 matches
Mail list logo
