[digitalradio] FCC and the unattended ALE/PACTOR lepers

2007-09-23 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Consider the following statements attributed to Hollingworth and the FCC's Cross. Hollingsworth offered good news and bad news. The good news: Nothing is wrong with Amateur Radio, he allowed. It is a good service that is showing its value to the public on a daily

RE: [digitalradio] FCC and the unattended ALE/PACTOR lepers

2007-09-23 Thread Rud Merriam
/ -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew O'Brien Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 3:48 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] FCC and the unattended ALE/PACTOR lepers Consider the following statements

Re: [digitalradio] FCC and the unattended ALE/PACTOR lepers

2007-09-23 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I agree Rud, thanks. On 9/23/07, Rud Merriam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My only criticism is you are lumping a tool, PACTOR, into a procedure discussion. PACTOR is a tool that has nothing to do with unattended operation, except it is used in unattended operation. Rud Merriam K5RUD

Re: [digitalradio] FCC and the unattended ALE/PACTOR lepers

2007-09-23 Thread Roger J. Buffington
Rud Merriam wrote: My only criticism is you are lumping a tool, PACTOR, into a procedure discussion. PACTOR is a tool that has nothing to do with unattended operation, except it is used in unattended operation. Which is about all it is used for. Nothing wrong with Pactor as a live QSO