You are 100% correct Rick. There have been many, including myself who have
encouraged the League to seek input from its members.
Some was started when the League started its little surveys on the web and now
expanding by asking for technical input.
So let's put on our thinking caps and tell
The ARRL has come under criticism in the past because it did not provide
enough input from the membership and I suspect that they are opening up
this line of communication from the members to even ask the questions to
determine what it is that we want (or not want), before they start
making
They say it's not an RFP, and I have no reason to doubt that, but
that still leaves me wondering what the League's query actually IS.
Has there been any articulation of what the League's purpose might be
in soliciting these comments? Is this a foray into standards-
setting? Product
ave been hesitant to comment on the ARRL seeking comments on a new HF digital
protocol...but let's look again at what they ask...
I. Comments from amateurs concerning development of an open-source
(non-proprietary) data communications protocol suitable for use by radio
amateurs over
OK so what we have here is a failure to communicate ?
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please click here to read the HFLINK recommendation
comments:
http://www.hflink.com/arrl/
Background
On 22 Feb 2007, the ARRL announced that it seeks
comments from
amateurs concerning
Please click here to read the HFLINK recommendation comments:
http://www.hflink.com/arrl/
Background
On 22 Feb 2007, the ARRL announced that it seeks comments from
amateurs concerning development of an open-source, non-proprietary,
data communications protocol suitable for use by radio amateurs
