[digitalradio] Olivia Frequencies and Modes Re: NEWBIE QUESTION FROM AC5JV

2009-11-29 Thread Juergen
Hi Bonnie, some comments from my experience. I have tried your proposed frequencies for Olivia and they are ok, more or less, but: 10142.5 will have the DK0WCY beacon directly fall into the Olivia signal, therefore I prefer the 10141.5 which is given in your plan as well but not as a center o

[digitalradio] Olivia Frequencies and Modes Re: NEWBIE QUESTION FROM AC5JV

2009-11-28 Thread expeditionradio
Hi George, http://hflink.com/olivia The most common flavor of Olivia is "500/16" and for DXing, you can find it on one of the following USB VFO Dial frequencies: 7042.5 USB 7072.5 USB 10142.5 USB 14075.65 USB 14074.65 USB 14077.65 USB 18102.65 USB When Olivia first began, the 1000/32 flavor wa

[digitalradio] Olivia frequencies Re: What modes are these?

2006-03-15 Thread expeditionradio
>< > I copied several CQ messages in PAX2 from EA2AFR on 14075... > ...looked like 9 separate frequencies on the waterfall, > but I could not find a mode in MultiPSK that suited. > What modes are being transmitted here or have been over > the last half an hour or so? Hi Alan, It may be Olivia

[digitalradio] Olivia frequencies

2006-01-19 Thread Sergey Kuzmin
Yes , I agree 100% . why not 500/16 - works well. I tried mainly on 80 meters - and can copy very weak signal www.rv3apm.com Thanks 73's Serge, RV3APM ps Why are we using 1000/32 on 20 meters, 500/8 works very well, or even 500/16 for dx ie, ZL to Europe, Ross ZL1

Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies

2006-01-18 Thread John Bradley
14073 and up for Olivia and other modes. ?   John VE5MU - Original Message - From: John Becker To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 6:58 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies At 12:43 PM 1/18/06, you wrote:>Hams n

Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies

2006-01-18 Thread John Bradley
nt of California.   HF is still a vital part of our emegency comms north of the 49th   John VE5MU - Original Message - From: KV9U To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:44 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies If I rem

Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies

2006-01-18 Thread John Becker
At 12:43 PM 1/18/06, you wrote: >Hams need to start flooding the FCC with documented >complains about Pactor III QRMing when users fail to >check for a busy frequency or are using Ham spectrum >for illegal purposes (e.g. business purposes). Did you ever stop to think maybe the guy * really * did

Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies

2006-01-18 Thread Giedrius
- Original Message - From: "kd4e" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:43 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies > Hams need to start flooding the FCC with documented > complains about Pactor III QRMing when users fail to > c

Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies

2006-01-18 Thread Giedrius
uruytrytryutryutryutryutryutr - Original Message - From: "kd4e" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:43 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies > Hams need to start flooding the FCC with documented > complains about Pactor III QRM

Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies

2006-01-18 Thread Giedrius
- Original Message - From: "kd4e" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:43 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies > Hams need to start flooding the FCC with documented > complains about Pactor III QRMing when users fail to > c

Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies

2006-01-18 Thread kd4e
Hams need to start flooding the FCC with documented complains about Pactor III QRMing when users fail to check for a busy frequency or are using Ham spectrum for illegal purposes (e.g. business purposes). We also need to be "above reproach" and make certain that we also check for busy frequencies.

Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies

2006-01-18 Thread KV9U
If I remember correctly, it seems that some years ago, when the U.S. expanded the phone band, either the band plan or the actual government sub bands were further expanded in Canada so that the VE hams would always have frequencies below the U.S. hams. It almost seemed a bit of an exclusivity k

Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies

2006-01-17 Thread Danny Douglas
ry 17, 2006 6:48 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies It can legally go up to 14150, but anything above that is for voice,cw and image only.   - Original Message - From: Ross To: digitalradio@yahoogroup

Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies

2006-01-17 Thread John Bradley
t: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies It can legally go up to 14150, but anything above that is for voice,cw and image only.   - Original Message - From: Ross To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:34 AM Su

Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies

2006-01-17 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
Just to avoid confusion on the ALE/Selcall subject, Part 97.3c5 defines phone as including "incidental tones for the purpose of selective calling." Leigh/WA5ZNU On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 4:48 pm, Danny Douglas wrote: > It can legally go up to 14150, but anything above that is for voice,cw > and image

Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies

2006-01-17 Thread Danny Douglas
It can legally go up to 14150, but anything above that is for voice,cw and image only.   - Original Message - From: Ross To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:34 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies Hi all, with

[digitalradio] Olivia frequencies

2006-01-17 Thread Ross
Hi all, with all the comment about pactor III and the problems therof, while is Olivia confined to 14.108.500 as a maximum, why cannot it go from 14.113 upwards, after all it is narrower than ssb.?? regards Ross ZL1WN   ps Why are we using 1000/32 on 20 meters, 500/8 works very well, or ev