Patrick,
> If you have some spare time, some modes would be interesting to be tested
> (with Multipsk): PSK10, PSKAM10
No problem. I'll send the results in a day or two.
Tony, K2MO
> Hello Tony,
>
> RR for all.
>
> If you have some spare time, some modes would be interesting to be tested
> (wi
Hello Tony,
RR for all.
If you have some spare time, some modes would be interesting to be tested
(with Multipsk):
- PSK10,
- PSKAM10,
- ARQ FAE in ALE400 (simply with "Unproto" APRS frames, as the ARQ memory
can be used only when connected),
- ALE AMD, DTM and DBM (DBM is the best ALE sub-mode
Hello Tony,
TKS for the interesting tests. Did you test PAX or PAX2? with Unproto frames?
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Tony
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 10:38 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Path Simulations for PAX / HF Packet
All
All,
Received several emails from fellow hams asking if I would run PAX and HF
Packet through the HF path simulator. Finished testing today and the results
show that PAX is clearly the better mode (see below).
It had a 3db SNR advantage while testing for sensitivity (no ionospheric
distortio
