From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of rein...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 8:33 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Random data vs Spread Spectrum
Hi W2XJ,
Could you tell me please ( I am believe to
It was not my idea. The author wanted the FCC to say it was not spread
spectrum. Unfortunately for all of us in the US, it is spread spectrum,
and the FCC rules do not allow that below 222 MHz.
I am not potentially damaging the hobby as a whole, just posting what I
know.
Go ahead and use ROS
ir you are wrong and you violated section this and that?
even I were to ask, why please and they say, we told you it was illegal!
73 Rein W6SZ
-Original Message-
>From: W2XJ
>Sent: Jul 12, 2010 5:52 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Random d
In the original FCC statement on this topic back in March (released via the
ARRL), they stated that they did feel that ROS was Spread Spectrum because
that was indeed what Jose called it. As they put it, the developer should
know what he developed. They further went on to say that it was up to each
On 7/12/2010 12:28:28 PM, KH6TY wrote:
> Lester, The "inventor" has shown over and over that he is not to be trusted,
> and
> so his block diagram would not be believed either. I suggested months ago
> to him to just send his code in confidence to the FCC, which they would
> keep private, and be
Why do you persist in getting the FCC involved? You are potentially
damaging the hobby as a whole. If one is qualified to hold a license the FCC
presumes ones ability to determine what operations are legal.
On 7/12/10 1:28 PM, "KH6TY" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Lester,
> The "inventor" has
radio] Random data vs Spread Spectrum
Lester,
The "inventor" has shown over and over that he is not to be trusted, and so
his block diagram would not be believed either. I suggested months ago to
him to just send his code in confidence to the FCC, which they would keep
private, and
Lester,
The "inventor" has shown over and over that he is not to be trusted, and
so his block diagram would not be believed either. I suggested months
ago to him to just send his code in confidence to the FCC, which they
would keep private, and be done with it. He replied that, arrogantly,
"Th
reto is
prohibited.
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 5:17 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Random data vs Spread Spectrum
Lester, I really appreciate your mannerly characterizati
Lester, I really appreciate your mannerly characterization of what I
wrote as "BS". :-(
From the Wikipedia, a more exact definition of spread spectrum is,
"*Frequency-hopping spread spectrum* (*FHSS*) is a method of
transmitting radio signals by rapidly switching a carrier
among many frequen
This, as we say in the lightning fast chicken navy, the following is simply
BS : Anyone with DigiPan or any other PSK31 program with a waterfall can
verify that the frequency spreading is random and not a function of the
data, which is the signature of spread-spectrum.
The use of a random
11 matches
Mail list logo
