Re: [digitalradio] Re: [illinoisdigitalham] Re: Power Mask for Bandwidth Rules - USA

2007-12-31 Thread John B. Stephensen
31, 2007 14:25 UTC Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: [illinoisdigitalham] Re: Power Mask for Bandwidth Rules - USA At one time the ARRL published plans for class B modulators with no filters. What they publish will stay with the times. There is no reason higher order analog filters can

Re: [digitalradio] Re: [illinoisdigitalham] Re: Power Mask for Bandwidth Rules - USA

2007-12-30 Thread W2XJ
Modern filters that have been used in real equipment since the 80s can be -1 db at 3100 and down 25 db at 3.5 k with negligible overshoot and ripple in the 10ths of a DB. Chebyshev filters are not really the filter of choice for this, elliptic tilers with some custom tweaks are a better

Re: [digitalradio] Re: [illinoisdigitalham] Re: Power Mask for Bandwidth Rules - USA

2007-12-30 Thread John B. Stephensen
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 23:16 UTC Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: [illinoisdigitalham] Re: Power Mask for Bandwidth Rules - USA Modern filters that have been used in real equipment since the 80s can be -1 db at 3100 and down 25 db at 3.5 k