--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Gerry Lawlor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Many years ago I had a G3PLX Mk II board which was interfaced to a
RTTY
> system to send and receive AMTOR. It was basically very close to the
> AMT-1 system without the modem. I think I have the board sti
Hi
Many years ago I had a G3PLX Mk II board which was interfaced to a RTTY
system to send and receive AMTOR. It was basically very close to the
AMT-1 system without the modem. I think I have the board still but in a
modified form and I have no data on the board at this stage. It did
work ex
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 5:38
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: amtor
anyone
hey I'm still lookin for all those cable thingies
for my PK232MBX ...I'll be there, eventually
- Original Message -
From:
obrienaj
To: di
hey I'm still lookin for all those cable thingies
for my PK232MBX ...I'll be there, eventually
- Original Message -
From:
obrienaj
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 7:39
PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: amtor
anyone
> > > I am not sure what you mean by AMTOR and Pactor being curtailed by
> > > being
> cheap modes.
I re-read my post and see that I did not make myself clear with that
sentence you refer to! What I meant was that the soundcard modes were
either free or cheap.. sorry about that. I have own
OK, John,
That explains it. Sort of like folks who like to enjoy playing with
"boatanchor" rigs.
When I was a teen, I could not afford even the average technology of the
time and had to settle for really low end hardware back in the early
1960's. For example, a Drake 2B receive was pretty much
No, because I can.
When Peter (G3PLX)) came out with Amtor there
was a printed circuit board one could buy to get on
this new mode for (if I recall) around $500 USD.
You see Rich I and others was operating Amtor
when 99% of the hams world wide was wondering
what that chirp chirp noise was. We had a
Hi Buddy,
Although I would agree that part of the attraction of new modes is the
novelty of operating them, most of us try out the new modes is to see
how well they actually perform under real world conditions and find out
which ones we prefer for operation. Of course, this assumes there is
s
> John,
>
> Is the reason for wanting to operate AMTOR just for the novelty of an
> old mode? I could understand using it if it was possible to do it as a
> sound card mode at a level comparable to hardware modems.
Is the reason for operating Olivia, Contesta, Domino, MT-63, etc, for the
novel
John,
Is the reason for wanting to operate AMTOR just for the novelty of an
old mode? I could understand using it if it was possible to do it as a
sound card mode at a level comparable to hardware modems.
When Pactor came into use in the late 1980's, AMTOR use was drastically
curtailed since P
THIS MESSAGE IS BEING SENT TO THE
LIST BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING:
-
This is an automatic reply to your email message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email address is protected by PeoplePC spaminator. Your email message
has been redirected a "Suspec
No not a one.
At 07:39 PM 1/23/06, you wrote:
>Any takers?
>
>Still have not got my PK232 out of the old box.
>
>I see TrueRTTY claims to support ARQ and implies via soundcard but I
>have to read more .
>
>
>Andy K3UK
>
>--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-
TrueTTY v2.50
TrueTTY Version history | Downloads and Registration
A program for amateur radio digital communications via a sound card.
Supported modes are RTTY (Baudot code), ASCII (7 or 8 bits), PSK31
(BPSK and QPSK), BPSK63, AMTOR-FEC (SITOR-B, NAVTEX), MultiFSK-16.
HF-PACKET and UHF-PA
Any takers?
Still have not got my PK232 out of the old box.
I see TrueRTTY claims to support ARQ and implies via soundcard but I
have to read more .
Andy K3UK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sitting on 7,075 (dial reading 7,077.12)
> Selcal WJAB
14 matches
Mail list logo
