: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 3:24
AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Bandwidth and
Olivia
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
"Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]...>
wrote:>> >>>AA6YQ response below> >
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.
The point has been clearly made that rendering a new
protocol "legal" in the US requires less than a day's work, and
poses no significant hurdle to the American protocol designer.
Howard's assertion has been debunked, and merits no further
attention.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digita
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> >>>AA6YQ response below
>
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Brad Granger"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Bernstein"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
All true, but your original statement remains false. I will
further
point out that had Olivia been developed by a US ham familiar with
the requirement to publish the protocol, none of the hand-wringing
would have occurred. Documenting a protocol in HTML, appropriately
meta-tagging it for sea
>>>AA6YQ response below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Brad Granger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > It may have been eloquent, Howard, but Brad's statement is
> > demonstrably incorrect.
> >
> >
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> It may have been eloquent, Howard, but Brad's statement is
> demonstrably incorrect.
>
>73,
>
>Dave, AA6YQ
Which part of it was incorrect Dave?
Brad.
Yahoo! Groups
"All sorts of regulatory hoops"? The reality is stated in
http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/techchar/
Documenting the first iteration of a new mode and uploading it to
one's personal web site so the iteration could be tested on-air
would take, what, an hour or two?
73,
It may have been eloquent, Howard, but Brad's statement is
demonstrably incorrect.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. Howard S. White"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thank you Brad for so elequently making my point...
>
> __
Howard's assertion was that current US regulations impeded US
amateurs from developing Olivia or PAX. Brad, your statement about
the delayed use of this mode by US amateurs, if true, would not
support Howard's claim. But your statement isn't true either!
According to its creator, Pawel SP9VRC,
