I did some measurements for a few days in november on ionospheric
doppler using whatever "constant" signals have been available, like WWV,
CHU, several broadcasters on 49 meters, including Radio Habana Cuba,
whose transmitters are some 20 km away from my QTH and become a mix of
NVIS and ground
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 11:44 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc
Well can only relate my impressions; hope others chime in
I think even though DominoEX halves the speed when FEC in engaged, it
is well worth the speed trade-off. 1
. It seems logical but I'm not so sure of
it...
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Jose A. Amador
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc
I am afraid that you can only reach
, 2007 1:58 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc
I have not used Moe's simulator yet. It takes my second PC that is not
working now.
Could you tell people like me which are those variables available on
Moe's simulator besides gaussian noise ?
several thousand QSOs for each mode on each
band.
Walt/K5YFW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jose A. Amador
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 1:47 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc
I am afraid that you can only reach a determination on SOME of the data
gathered with ionospheric data archives.
I think that Walt's proposal is a very good idea, but only part of it
will have verifiable path conditions. Nevertheless, you have to walk the
tunnel to get to see the light at the
I have not used Moe's simulator yet. It takes my second PC that is not
working now.
Could you tell people like me which are those variables available on
Moe's simulator besides gaussian noise ?
So far I have only seen reports on gaussian noise using Moe's simulator.
And agreed. Working in conc
radio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of jhaynesatalumni
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:50 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rick,
>
> I hope you or someone is making a list of which modes work the best
on each band and in varying conditions
This harks back to my recent comment on Olivia - how one night I was
getting so
domino EX , on multipsk. sorry if I mis-lead you Ozhan
John
- Original Message -
From: ozhan onder
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:15 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Domnio, PAX etc
Hello John,
What is DEX John?,a new digi mode
Is it the band or the mode ? ? ?
It seems to me in my 35 years as a ham that 80 and 160
are at it's best this time of year.
John, W0JAB
At 09:51 PM 2/13/2007, you wrote:
>Hi Bill,
>
>Yes, busy night tonight on 160:)
>
>The question I wanted to ask the group was whether they have found on
>the l
sometime in late April or May, I will volunteer to start doind this.
73,
Walt/K5YFW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of KV9U
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 9:51 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Domnio
Hello John,
What is DEX John?,a new digi mode to play with?..Tell us a little
bit..
vy tnx.
73's de Özhan TA3BQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> With respect to MT63 , I have used it extensively in the past and
found it wanting, especially trying t
With respect to MT63 , I have used it extensively in the past and found it
wanting, especially trying to tune a weak signal under less than
optimum conditions, as the noise covered the audio up. Under side by side
tests it did not copy as well as Olivia (1000/32) . probably half as well
on
Well can only relate my impressions; hope others chime in
I think even though DominoEX halves the speed when FEC in engaged, it
is well worth the speed trade-off. 160/80 seems to vary night to
night in this regard; probably due to qrn and multipath. It also
depends on one's ability/willingn
Hi Bill,
Yes, busy night tonight on 160:)
The question I wanted to ask the group was whether they have found on
the lower bands (especially 80 and 160) that DominoEX (DEX) is better
when operating at a given speed such as DEX11/without FEC or is it
better at twice the speed, but with FEC, e.g.
Hi Rick,
Just FYI; you and Dave (K3GAU) were solid copy on DoiminoEX on 160
tonight despite me using my 80 meter antenna. Actually seemed best
using 22 baud with FEC...one or two static crash hits, but overall
impressive considering my antenna limitations on 160 meters.
73
Bill N9DSJ
--- In
17 matches
Mail list logo