[digitalradio] Re: Re-inventing the JT65A messages for HF?

2007-04-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien
-Thanks Bill and Jose, I agree. Andy -- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I think it is not a good idea, at least so far. RRR, RO, and 73 are shorthand messages, no real text sent, but a combo of tones, and that has adventages at very low

[digitalradio] Re: Re-inventing the JT65A messages for HF?

2007-04-05 Thread Bill McLaughlin
Hi Andy, Think there is a mixed bag; some of use have used the WSJT modes for some time on vhf/uhf for EME and MS;p so we tend to stick to known conventions. So far I have seen no reason to deviate from that... 73 es be well, Bill N9DSJ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien