[digitalradio] Re: Recent MFSK16 DX

2009-02-17 Thread jhaynesatalumni
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Graham" wrote: > but with the stability of modern rigs I dont see why the > original mfsk should not make a come back ? The only time I had trouble with MFSK16 and frequency drift was when I was using the Elecraft K-2 radio with its 100W amplifier, and befo

[digitalradio] Re: Recent MFSK16 DX

2009-02-16 Thread Graham
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Vojtech Bubnik" wrote: > > > In a simple shoot out between olivia 250 x8 and msfk16 , olivia > > stopped decoding whilst mfsk was still at 100% ... thought that was > > not supposed to happen ? > > Hi Graham. > > I am certainly not surprised and it con

[digitalradio] Re: Recent MFSK16 DX

2009-02-15 Thread Vojtech Bubnik
> In a simple shoot out between olivia 250 x8 and msfk16 , olivia > stopped decoding whilst mfsk was still at 100% ... thought that was > not supposed to happen ? Hi Graham. I am certainly not surprised and it confirms my Gaussian noise tests. Olivia trades sensitivity for automatic tuning. M

[digitalradio] Re: Recent MFSK16 DX

2009-02-14 Thread Graham
In a simple shoot out between olivia 250 x8 and msfk16 , olivia stopped decoding whilst mfsk was still at 100% ... thought that was not supposed to happen ? G .. --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien" wrote: > > IW7DGY 10140.3 ES1HJ/QRPMFSK16 - 599