I should point out that in my tests of the Alpha version PackinkW (with
Winmor) the busy detect worked. I only tried it a few times , and not under
all conditions, but several times WINMOR told me the frequency appeared busy
and asked me if I really wanted to start a transmit.
--- In digitalr
If you want to know more about the GPL, here's the source:
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/education
> > My personal thougths:
> > It is very impolite to push a freeware developer to release his source with
> > legal threats. The developper will get angry and stop working (for free)
> > for the ham-
Cesco,
Most of us do appreciate the freeware authors. Even if not free as in
beer. However, where you and I differ is that if they are doing
something illegal, I would not support them and would rather they not
produce the software in such a case.
If what they are doing is legal, then very fe
> Since RDFT was released under the GPL license, failure to release the
> source code for SCAMP may be violation of the GPL license.
The rdft routines are not integrated into scamp, they are "external
exe's". Same trick is used by mixw, gpl-code is moved to an "external"
library.
While this see
On 6/9/07, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have wondered about this as well. The author said he thought he would
> eventually release it and, at the time, I had very little knowledge of
> the GPL. I am still not totally clear on this, but since SCAMP was only
> a beta test, and not a fully r
I have wondered about this as well. The author said he thought he would
eventually release it and, at the time, I had very little knowledge of
the GPL. I am still not totally clear on this, but since SCAMP was only
a beta test, and not a fully released product, perhaps that allows you
to not re
Since RDFT was released under the GPL license, failure to release the
source code for SCAMP may be violation of the GPL license.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As far as I know the Winlink 2000 developer has not released it. H
Rick,
One point here in a very good message. IF both control operators are
present, and IF the bandwidth of the protocol is wider than 500 Hz,
operations are NOT limited to the auto-sub-bands. Also, if an
unattended station is NOT in the United States, and a US Amateur is
present, he may tra
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Joseph Ivey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Where can the SCAMP software be downloaded?
Joe might check: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SCAMPprotocol/
HTH,
Jerry K0HZI
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
Yahoo! Grou
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Joe Ivey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> I don't think SCAMP has been released to the public yet. From what I
hear it
> is still in beta testing by a dozen or so.
>
> Joe Ivey
> W4JSI
Joe,
Just downloaded a bunch of files from:
http://groups.yahoo.
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: scamp on 14.114 12:00 UTC
I've noticed that SSB spatter will also trigger the detector. Guess this is
where the adjustment level comes in.
73
Ron KA2HZO
- Original Message -
From: Dr. Howard S. White
To: digitalradio@yahoogroup
t: Re: [digitalradio] Re: scamp on 14.114 12:00 UTC
So far from my limited on air testing ...[I might have the detection levels
set a bit high as SCAMP now shows channel busy a bit too often. I need to
play with the detection level settings a bit more .]...
..it seems to work surprisingly
com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: scamp on 14.114 12:00 UTC
So far from my limited on air testing ...[I might have the detection levels
set a bit high as SCAMP now shows channel busy a bit too often. I need
to play with the detection level settings a bit more .]...
..it seems to wo
wfully Extremely Six Sado Masochist"
- Original Message -
From: Dave Bernstein
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 10:51 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: scamp on 14.114 12:00 UTC
I'm in the middle of implementing RFC1867 so DXK
ished"
> "Awfully Extremely Six Sado Masochist"
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Dave Bernstein
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 7:47 PM
> Subject: [digitalradio] Re: scamp on 14.114 12:00 UTC
>
>
>
&g
-
From: Dave Bernstein
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 7:47 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: scamp on 14.114 12:00 UTC
I joined earlier today and the approval was instantaneous.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups
I joined earlier today and the approval was instantaneous.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone now join the SCAMP yahoogroup?
>
> Those of us who joined the group early, but were not alpha testers, were
> actu
17 matches
Mail list logo
