Re: [digitalradio] Re: Time-Sharing Our Ham Bands, Designing Digital Methods for Time-Sharing

2006-01-01 Thread F.R. Ashley
: that some operators of automatic > stations consider their networks and traffic to be more important > than low-speed, real-time keyboard-to-keyboard or voice-to-voice > QSOs, and thus will fire up on an already-occupied frequency rather > than take the time to QSY. > >73, > >Dave, AA

[digitalradio] Re: Time-Sharing Our Ham Bands, Designing Digital Methods for Time-Sharing

2006-01-01 Thread Dave Bernstein
Channel sharing protocols are fine, presuming that they verify the frequency to be clear of other users in other modes before transmitting. Your response to Danny pegged everyone's "bad amateur practice" meter because you said you'd run your "FEC, ARQ, or other types of persistent and repetit