On Sunday 13 January 2008 08:15:45 pm John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
> The "anti-automatic" and "anti-everything-that-is-not-PSK31"
> hams have a very hard time understanding what the rest are doing.
Some of us are just ant-Bully In The Neighborhood.
You simply refuse to recognize that some modes
Comments in line
>Your problem, John, is that you are unable to stick to an argument of
>the issues. Instead, everything becomes personal with you as evidenced
>by the above ad hominem remarks. Disappointing.
Wrong again Roger.
I do pactor as well as RTTY and Amtor.
I can copy each of them mo
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
>
> At 08:14 AM 1/13/2008, you wrote:
> > Twice in the last seven days I have had QSOs disrupted by a Pactor
> > Winlink station firing up on top of my QSO. Fortunately, both times
> > I turned the power way up (from about 40 watts to 200 watts) and we
> > were able to wo
At 08:14 AM 1/13/2008, you wrote:
> Twice in the last seven days
>I have had QSOs disrupted by a Pactor Winlink station firing up on top
>of my QSO. Fortunately, both times I turned the power way up (from
>about 40 watts to 200 watts) and we were able to work through it.
Roger - how do you k
At 08:05 AM 1/13/2008, you wrote:
>This is getting ridiculous! It takes me nearly 10 seconds to say
>"This is AA5J Is the frequency in use?"
In what mode?
> Bill N9DSJ wrote:
> Hello Bonnie,
> Thanks for the reply.
> It just seemed pretty convoluted; and, at best, nebulous.
> To be honest I have never heard anyone complain about
> soundings, but I may miss a lot. Compared to some
> best-not-be-mentioned systems, ALE operations have not
> shown up
> All the ALE data activity is in the automatic subbands unless the
> stations manually QSY off frequency under operator control.
>
> So what's the concern?
As long as it always stays in the automatic subbands, there should be no
concern. In fact, ALE is a valuable resource, IMHO.
Skip KH6TY
Skip wrote:
> > except in designated beacon areas or the
> > automatic subbands ( where it is presumed by the FCC to occur, since
> > unattended stations do not, and cannot, listen first for any other
> activity
> > within range of the unattended station).
All the ALE data activity is in the autom
Exactly... they *just* don't get it
Bill KA8VIT
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:22:37 -0500
> Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war with HFlink
>
> Look at it this way - N
expeditionradio wrote:
>
> This is simply childish backlash directed at me personally because I
> opposed the Digital Stone Age Petition. It really has nothing at all
> to do with HFLINK or ALE. It will go away.
>
> Bonnie KQ6XA
Actually, what is childish is the never-ending assertion by Winl
This is getting ridiculous! It takes me nearly 10 seconds to say
"This is AA5J Is the frequency in use?"
Look at it this way - NO transmissions without listening first, either ALE
soundings, beacons, or mailboxes of any kind, are permissible on the
*shared* HF amateur bands, except in designated beacon areas or the
automatic subbands ( where it is presumed by the FCC to occur, since
unattended sta
Hello Bonnie,
Thanks for the reply.
It just seemed pretty convoluted; and, at best, nebulous.
To be honest I have never heard anyone complain about soundings, but I
may miss a lot. Compared to some best-not-be-mentioned systems, ALE
operations have not shown up on my qrm map.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
-
Or "This Was" :)
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patricia \(Elaine\) Gibbons"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> That's the way I look at it, Bill ...
>
>
>
> A sounding message is simply the station's callsign as the ALE ID,
> and soundings are only done if the station has an operator
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Bill McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hard to discern what is actually happening; seems like a tempest in a
> teapot.
>
> 73,
>
> Bill N9DSJ
Hi Bill,
This is simply childish backlash directed at me personally because I
opposed the Digital Stone
Elaine
--
Patricia (Elaine) Gibbons
WA6UBE / AAR9JA
http://www.qrz.com/wa6ube
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill McLaughlin
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 4:42 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Troub
Hard to discern what is actually happening; seems like a tempest in a
teapot.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After Tony Blair has solved the Israel-Palestine issue, he may be
> needed to address those old fashioned RTTY folks w
17 matches
Mail list logo
