Hi Julian,
What are you using to analyze the WSPR data after downloading? Thank you.
73... Jon W1MNK
g4ilo wrote:
I don't think you can impute anything meaningful from one set of
reports. Normal QSB will make a difference of from several to many dB
which can only be averaged out over a
My own brain, pencil and paper. :) I just average out the reports from
different stations. I use two different transmitters to send two WSPR
transmissions at the same time and using the same power on different
frequencies using the antenna under test and the one I am comparing it to.
Julian,
Julian,
I didn't consider the brain. Oh my :-) Excellent information. Brain 1
computer 0.
73... Jon W1MNK
g4ilo wrote:
My own brain, pencil and paper. :) I just average out the reports from
different stations. I use two different transmitters to send two WSPR
transmissions at the same
I call it the Meat Computer.
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jon Maguire w1...@... wrote:
Julian,
I didn't consider the brain. Oh my :-) Excellent information. Brain 1
computer 0.
73... Jon W1MNK
g4ilo wrote:
My own brain, pencil and paper. :) I just average out the
I don't think you can impute anything meaningful from one set of reports.
Normal QSB will make a difference of from several to many dB which can only be
averaged out over a period of time.
WSPR is much better IMO for this sort of thing. You can leave it running, go
and do something
