RE: [digitalradio] Protected HF frequencies

2010-02-21 Thread kq6i
[I'd suggest that they get 5kHZ of 80M, 60M (yes , 60) , 20, and 10 , no other bands.] ditto, Norway es I think Bangladesh are not cursed to 60M channelized purgatory. Wakeup FCC. rgrds Craig kq6i -Original Message- From: obrienaj [mailto:k3uka...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February

Re: [digitalradio] Protected HF frequencies

2010-02-21 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
At 09:51 AM 2/21/2010, you wrote: Actually John, I am beginning to think that there could be merit in protecting some frequencies for certain use . Maybe the PACTOR, WINMOR, PACKET, ALE, PSKMAIL, unattended stations SHOULD get a small slice of spectrum. And for the attended stations?

Re: [digitalradio] Protected HF frequencies

2010-02-21 Thread Dave Ackrill
John Becker, WØJAB wrote: At 09:51 AM 2/21/2010, you wrote: Actually John, I am beginning to think that there could be merit in protecting some frequencies for certain use . Maybe the PACTOR, WINMOR, PACKET, ALE, PSKMAIL, unattended stations SHOULD get a small slice of spectrum. And

Re: [digitalradio] Protected HF frequencies

2010-02-21 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
Actually Andy What we are using right now are a few WinLink frequencies. Why you ask? because every time we set camp anyplace someone will copy the CW ID and them the hate email starts. Not to mention the fact that AEL ran off a large bunch of people that had been using everything from RTTY to

RE: [digitalradio] Protected HF frequencies

2010-02-21 Thread Fred VE3FAL
I too do have PACTOR and AMTOR qso's on occasion as well, only time I do use the mode, not into the pactor mailbox thing too much yet.. Might be me as well. Fred CIW649/VE3FAL CFARS Member SATERN Member SATERN Amateur Radio Liaison Officer DEC Amethyst District ARES Remember guys, not