Excellent idea to ask FCC for an opinion.
Dave K3DCW referred to Part 97, but the section he quoted really only describes
emission mode designation codes for SS, and does not technically describe how
FCC defines SS. It's almost as if Part 97 assumes the definition is so well
known that it's
On 02/21/2010 11:31 AM, J. Moen wrote:
But right now, I think that since Part 97 does not appear to define what
SS is, it is not possible to definitively say whether ROS is legal or
not legal in FCC jurisdictions. Asking FCC for an opinion is a great idea.
Of course, there is always the
m5...@blueyonder.co.uk
hello all.
can someone tell me where i go to
download this ros.
many thanks 73 ivor/m5ply
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS, legal in USA
ivor/m5ply
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien mailto:k3uka...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS, legal in USA?
The description says it uses spread-spectrun
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbzY3MjhrBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE4NzExODMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYzMTA4BHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZtYnJzBHN0aW1lAzEyNjY1OTc1MzA-?o=6Joe,
N8FQ...
http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/news/part97/d-305.html
Describes Spread Spectrum as
Andy obrien wrote:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbzY3MjhrBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE4NzExODMEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDYzMTA4BHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZtYnJzBHN0aW1lAzEyNjY1OTc1MzA-?o=6Joe,
N8FQ...
http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/news/part97/d-305.html
Dave Ackrill wrote:
I'd actually say that the term 'spread spectrum' is actually incorrect
as far as RIO is concerned. It's actually no more 'spread' than some of
the other digi-modes and less 'spread' than some versions of Olivia.
Sorry, I meant ROS of course.
Mark it down as my senior
Unfortunately, the ROS explanation of Spread Spectrum and Frequency
Hopping in the documentation too closely resembles the definition of
Spread Spectrum as written in the Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spread_spectrum. Since ROS claims to be
Frequency Hopping and Spread Spectrum by its
Thanks Skip, I agree after doing some more reading and I will not use this
mode on HF. Your UHF idea sounds good.
Andy K3Uk
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:32 PM, KH6TY kh...@comcast.net wrote:
Unfortunately, the ROS explanation of Spread Spectrum and Frequency Hopping
in the documentation too
Andy obrien wrote:
Anyone know if this mode is legal in the USA. ?
Why would it not be Andy?
If it is Audio Phase Shift Keying then it's no different to PSK31, if it
is more like WSJT then as long as JT65A (and all the other WSJT modes)
are legal, then what makes this one any different?
I
The description says it uses spread-spectrun
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Dave Ackrill dave.g0...@tiscali.co.ukwrote:
Andy obrien wrote:
Anyone know if this mode is legal in the USA. ?
Why would it not be Andy?
I
As long as it is 500 Hz and 300 baud, it's fine.
-Joe, N8FQ
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:04:29 -0500
Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know if this mode is legal in the USA. ?
Andy K3Uk
Andy obrien wrote:
The description says it uses spread-spectrun
How wide is 'wide'?
Not got to grips with this as yet, obviously.
Dave (G0DJA)
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS, legal in USA?
The description says it uses spread-spectrun
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Dave Ackrill dave.g0...@tiscali.co.uk
14 matches
Mail list logo
