expeditionradio wrote:
A blatant example was what we saw with abolition of morse testing. If
the old morse test wasn't enough to scare away the first generation of
computer-raised youngsters, then the next generation of web kids was
turned off by the vitriol spewed by those who fought to keep
) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Miroslav Skoric (YT7MPB) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, July 5, 2008, 11:16 AM
expeditionradio wrote:
A blatant example was what we saw
Miroslav,
Try going to:
http://www.tapr.org/pr_whypacketradio.html
to see if it meets your needs.
Rick W3BI
--- On Sat, 7/5/08, Miroslav Skoric (YT7MPB) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Miroslav Skoric (YT7MPB) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
.
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: kc4cop996 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 4:12 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
Patrick:
Please advise the version of MixW that has Contestia as one of its
modes. I
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
Hello Dick,
Mixw has a Contestia+RTTYM DLL. The second mode (RTTYM) is not very
interesting has you have the same sort of problem as with RTTY (you can
switch from one set to another of characters and lose part
@yahoogroups.com
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 3:35 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com, Dave AA6YQ aa6yq@ wrote:
On what basis do you claim
HI John,
I was in the USAF from 1968-1972, and we used the old oilers with punched
tape, I think it was a model 15? Nothing like the smell and noise of the
old clunkers.
73 Buddy WB4M
Interesting statement.
Not to long ago I was at a meeting of a big group of hams.
The subject came up
I was in the USAF from 1968 to 1972 but did not work in communications
(more along the lines of security, HI). It was not until a few years
after I was relicensed in 1980 that I got involved with digital modes
buying a Model 15 and making a simple TU promoted by the ARRL as a state
of the art
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 8:34 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
HI John,
I was in the USAF from 1968-1972, and we used the old oilers with punched
tape, I think it was a model 15? Nothing like the smell and noise of the
old
Yes indeed. And that noise and smell lives on in this shack...
You should be here sometime when I have all 3 running at once.
What a wonderful sound !
At 07:34 AM 7/3/2008, you wrote:
HI John,
I was in the USAF from 1968-1972, and we used the old oilers with punched
tape, I think it was a
: Thursday, July 03, 2008 9:35 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave AA6YQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On what basis do you claim that Olivia, DominoEX, and MFSK are
better than
PSK for ragchewing
: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
Yes indeed. And that noise and smell lives on in this shack...
You should be here sometime when I have all 3 running at once.
What a wonderful sound !
At 07:34 AM 7/3/2008, you wrote:
HI John,
I was in the USAF from 1968-1972, and we used
and Multipsk
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 3:35 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave AA6YQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On what
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
Hello all,
Just to say that aside to Olivia, you have a mode which name is Contestia,
which is twice quicker than Olivia and almost as sensitive. It is built on
the same principle as Olivia but with different
Lindecker
*Sent:* Thursday, July 03, 2008 3:06 PM
*To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
Hello all,
Just to say that aside to Olivia, you have a mode which name is
Contestia,
which is twice quicker than Olivia and almost as sensitive
--- On Thu, 7/3/08, tailfeathers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: tailfeathers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, July 3, 2008, 4:03 PM
PSK software is simple to use and free everywhere
Benson wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave AA6YQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On what basis do you claim that Olivia, DominoEX, and MFSK are
better than
PSK for ragchewing? Olivia is slow, and MFSK is difficult to tune.
I could care less about mode envy but I will
garylinnrobinson wrote:
If most PSK operators are interested in rag chewing -they need to move
on to a better digital mode. PSK and RTTY are the two worst modes
available. And that's the problem. Too many people, groups, and
leaders in the Ham Community promoting OLD and less than effective
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
If most PSK operators are interested in rag chewing -they need to move
on to a better digital mode. PSK and RTTY are the two worst modes
available. And that's the problem. Too many people, groups, and
leaders in the Ham Community
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
garylinnrobinson wrote:
If most PSK operators are interested in rag chewing -they need to move
on to a better digital mode. PSK and RTTY are the two worst modes
available. And that's the problem. Too many
I think the basic problem is that fewer than 10% of PSK31 operators have ever
bothered to learn how to set up split operation. One more reason that the mode
is great for casual DXing, but next to useless for serious DX work.
73,
Bill
Bill Lovell wrote:
I think the basic problem is that fewer than 10% of PSK31 operators have
ever bothered to learn how to set up split operation. One more reason
that the mode is great for casual DXing, but next to useless for serious
DX work.
73,
Bill
I have never tried PSK31. I
] On
Behalf Of expeditionradio
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 9:12 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
Dave, AA6YQ wrote,
The amateur radio's community rapidly adopted PSK31
once panoramic reception on soundcard-equipped
PCs became
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave, AA6YQ wrote,
The amateur radio's community rapidly adopted PSK31 once panoramic
As usual, Dave puts the correct perspective to advancing technology. Ask
yourself why others would attack what many radio amateurs enjoy doing
and even go so far as to use extreme name calling and personal attacks
of hams don't happen to support their vision or beliefs of what should
be a
25 matches
Mail list logo
