Re: [digitalradio] Re: Ready for Q15X25 packet test ...

2009-05-02 Thread Rick W
Very good points, Darko, Even though the WINMOR set of protocols has been developed by one group, the protocol is open so that other individuals or groups can incorporate the protocol and may even further develop the protocol as they see fit. If the initial development group decided to not make

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Ready for Q15X25 packet test ...

2009-05-02 Thread Jose A. Amador
Exactly. With the prevailing bad propagation (and maybe the increased noise levels around my QTH) it is rare lately that P III can go into "fourth gear" or higher... And I did not have good luck with Q15X25. It was more tha five years ago, and I blamed my old computer... 73, Jose, CO2JA Ric

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Ready for Q15X25 packet test ...

2009-05-01 Thread 9A3LI
On Sat, 02 May 2009 01:49:47 +0200, Rick W wrote: > Based upon the modulation developed for WINMOR, is it fair to say that > some of the wider and higher speed modes will be roughly equivalent to > Q15X25? If WINMOR will be "interface" only for Winlink then it will be useless ! Sure, that will b

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Ready for Q15X25 packet test ...

2009-05-01 Thread Rick W
Based upon the modulation developed for WINMOR, is it fair to say that some of the wider and higher speed modes will be roughly equivalent to Q15X25? It still is perplexing to me as to why Q15X25 did so poorly (based on numerous comments from those that tried it) yet the modulation is surprisi

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Ready for Q15X25 packet test ...

2009-05-01 Thread 9A3LI
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:30:21 +0100, Peter Jordahl wrote: > > Anyone know of a standalone Windows version? > There is no standalone versuion, you can find "driver" for Flex32 called "soundmodem" too. You can use that "modem" with packet terminal software WPP and Paxon. But, MixW working much be

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Ready for Q15X25 packet test ...

2009-02-09 Thread John Bradley
23 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Ready for Q15X25 packet test ... In Canada we are limited to 1000Hz bandwidth between 10.1 and 10.150MHz, as per RBR-4. However, we are primary users of 30m and are allowed 1000W, if I read the regs right. -- Sean - VA5LF

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Ready for Q15X25 packet test ...

2009-02-08 Thread Sean Cavanaugh
In Canada we are limited to 1000Hz bandwidth between 10.1 and 10.150MHz, as per RBR-4. However, we are primary users of 30m and are allowed 1000W, if I read the regs right. -- Sean - VA5LF Rick W wrote: > > > Q15X25 and other wide modes (voice communications bandwidth) are legal > here in the

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Ready for Q15X25 packet test ...

2009-02-08 Thread Rick W
Q15X25 and other wide modes (voice communications bandwidth) are legal here in the U.S., and if operated 10.140 to 10.150, also meet the IARU Region 2 Band Plan recommendations (maximum 2700 Hz). I am currently in contact with my wife for a couple of hours on HF (3620 LSB phone) as she travels

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Ready for Q15X25 packet test ...

2009-02-08 Thread Russell Blair
I can hear the signals there but I have no software to use for this mode, sorry.   Russell   = IN GOD WE TRUST ! = Russell Blair (NC5O) Skype-Russell.Blair Hell Field #300 DRCC #55 30m Dig-group #693 --- On Sun, 2/8/09, maiko4 wrote: From: maiko4 Subject: [d