Re: The Canterbury Project

2011-04-02 Thread Jerry Feldman
This brings thoughts to United Linux. One of the major players in United Linux was Caldera Systems who renamed itself, The SCO Group. Currently the bankrupt SCO Group is trying to sell itself to unXis. On 04/01/2011 06:31 PM, edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote: On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 18:15:23 -0400 Dan

Re: The Canterbury Project

2011-04-02 Thread edwardp
On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 08:39:53 -0400 Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org wrote: This brings thoughts to United Linux. One of the major players in United Linux was Caldera Systems who renamed itself, The SCO Group. Currently the bankrupt SCO Group is trying to sell itself to unXis. Does anyone know if

Re: The Canterbury Project

2011-04-02 Thread Stephen Jahl
Does anyone know if this /was/ a April Fools joke? The front Debian home page still brings up this Canterbury Project page this morning... Yes, April Fools. Confirmed here: http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110401 -Steve ___ Discuss mailing list

Windows 7

2011-04-02 Thread James Kramer
I have a year old computer that is pretty much laid out. Anyway. I have installed various versions of 64 bit Linux with no problems. I also install a 32 bit of Win 7 with not problems however it took several hours. This weekend I decided to reinstall a 64 bit version of windows 7. I can not

White balance for the whole X desktop

2011-04-02 Thread Brendan Kidwell
What is the general procedure for creating and applying a white balance formula in modern GNOME/KDE/XFCE desktops? What I have: - KDE (Kubuntu 10.10) - my new Dell Vostro v130 with a decidedly blue backlight that's rather depressing What I want: - Create a profile as I'm shown some reference

Re: White balance for the whole X desktop

2011-04-02 Thread Dan Ritter
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 08:54:53PM -0400, Brendan Kidwell wrote: What is the general procedure for creating and applying a white balance formula in modern GNOME/KDE/XFCE desktops? What I have: - KDE (Kubuntu 10.10) - my new Dell Vostro v130 with a decidedly blue backlight that's rather