Scott Ehrlich writes:
I am tailing /var/log/messages and only see host-only traffic, but
another terminal window running tcpdump (or tcpdump -X port 514) DOES
show incoming traffic from the clients. My question is where the
heck is that data going? There are NO error messages on whichever
Hopefully without getting into an augment about the pros and cons of LVM
vs btrfs or zfs, does anyone want to discuss the pros and cons of LVM
device for a virtual machine vs a file on a file system for a virtual
machine?
So, do you create a 30G file on a file system, like EXT3, jfs, or xfs and
Mark,
Think about it this way: when using a file on the file system the VM has
a whole extra layer of indirection that it has to go through, because it
has to go through the FS layer in the VM, then the block layer in the VM,
then the VM system storage layer, and then the FS layer in the host,
Mark,
Think about it this way: when using a file on the file system the VM has
a whole extra layer of indirection that it has to go through, because it
has to go through the FS layer in the VM, then the block layer in the VM,
then the VM system storage layer, and then the FS layer in the
LVM2, barring a specific need for image files. I/O performance is
really the least concern.
- I can make snapshots of running systems with LVM2. Can't do it at all
with image files.
- I can easily resize LVM-backed file systems. Image files typically
require conversion and writing new
From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org [mailto:discuss-
bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On Behalf Of Derek Atkins
Think about it this way: when using a file on the file system the VM has
a whole extra layer of indirection that it has to go through, because it
has to go through
From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org [mailto:discuss-
bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On Behalf Of
there is caching in the file system layer that we
wouldn't get with LVM,
Think about it like this:
On reads: The guest OS will read some file. If it's a partial file, or
it's
On 03/29/2012 01:59 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
I see very little, if any, argument in favor of using the file. I suppose,
if you wanted to run your virtual head on some other machine, then you could
export your file via NFS instead of iscsi, and that gives you one extra
degree of freedom if
My current position is described as Engineer who wears many hats. Not a
title I would use on my resume. A co-worker told that there is a very specific
title for the work I do, but he can't remember it.
What I do, and have been doing for two companies since 2000, is to manage the
computer
Your title has little bearing on the work you do. It's what your box on
the org chart is called. It may also be a pay grade reference. Check
with your HR people if you've forgotten your formal title.
--
Rich P.
___
Discuss mailing list
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Richard Pieri richard.pi...@gmail.com wrote:
Your title has little bearing on the work you do. It's what your box on the
org chart is called. It may also be a pay grade reference. Check with your
HR people if you've forgotten your formal title.
--
Rich P.
Great discussion. Thanks
Jay
On Mar 29, 2012 2:12 PM, Mark Woodward ma...@mohawksoft.com wrote:
On 03/29/2012 01:59 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
I see very little, if any, argument in favor of using the file. I
suppose,
if you wanted to run your virtual head on some other machine, then
Of course I know what HR calls me (my job title, as opposed to work
title): Senior Applications Engineer. Why would I post here to get that
information?
Okay, maybe I should have said that my job is going away and I'd like
something fairly descriptive on my resume that might cause a person
On Mar 29, 2012, at 5:27 PM, Jerry Natowitz wrote:
Okay, maybe I should have said that my job is going away and I'd like
something fairly descriptive on my resume that might cause a person or (more
likely) data mining program to notice me.
Yes, that does change my inferred context.
Your
14 matches
Mail list logo
