On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Edward Ned Harvey b...@nedharvey.com
wrote:
On mac windows, I'm accustomed to Time Machine and Acronis. Key features
are:
. Run in the background, low priority, no complaints from user about
performance.
. Daily (or more frequent) incrementals
. Able to
From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org [mailto:discuss-
bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On Behalf Of Jack Coats
I have used crashplan (crashplan.com)
So ... I guess I didn't make it clear enough ... Must be able to backup the
whole system. Including the OS, and all the
From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org [mailto:discuss-
bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On Behalf Of Jack Coats
In old SunOS days, we could issue the 'sync' command, twice, to ensure
all system
Oh - That would be the command to flush memory to disk. I'm talking about a
level
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:00:27PM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
On mac windows, I'm accustomed to Time Machine and Acronis. Key features
are:
. Run in the background, low priority, no complaints from user about
performance.
. Daily (or more frequent) incrementals
. Able to specify
John Abreau abre...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Edward Ned Harvey b...@nedharvey.com wrote:
A command inside of bash generates output every second (ping) redirected to
a file.
If you run the command on an interactive shell, then you can tail -f the
file, and see the
Edward Ned Harvey writes:
A command inside of bash generates output every second (ping) redirected to
a file.
If you run the command on an interactive shell, then you can tail -f the
file, and see the output live as it happens.
But if you run the command inside an at script, or a cron
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Unfortunately, even when I nice dump to the fullest extent,
it's still too resource intensive. Users complain tremendously, as long as
it's running.
Maybe try ionice?
Must be able to backup the whole system. Including the OS, and all
the customizations...
Do you
On 6/12/2012 11:00 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
On mac windows, I'm accustomed to Time Machine and Acronis. Key features
are:
. Run in the background, low priority, no complaints from user about
performance.
. Daily (or more frequent) incrementals
. Able to specify excludes
. Able to restore
