[Discuss] Revisiting VMWare ESX backup options

2014-10-29 Thread Scott Ehrlich
We have some new Dell rack servers running new installs of ESX 5.5 U1, and looking to buy a redundant server to use as a backup for the primary. The budget is healthy enough for appropriate hardware and storage (likely a duplicate of the primary). The primary is very appropriate for its tasks.

Re: [Discuss] Revisiting VMWare ESX backup options

2014-10-29 Thread Bob Dunphy
Another one to consider. I have user Trilead VM Explorer with good results. The things I like is there is no additional cost to do additional servers and it will do ESX, ESXi and Hyper-V. http://www.trilead.com/features/ The cost is reasonable at $1,390 - Thank you, *Bob Dunphy* - *Sr.

Re: [Discuss] Revisiting VMWare ESX backup options

2014-10-29 Thread Richard Pieri
On 10/29/2014 11:04 AM, Scott Ehrlich wrote: What are your thoughts on product(s) to use for primary to backup and for options for off-site - cloud vs storage facility that gives us space on a system? Cloud is a non-starter. Megaupload. Code/Spaces. Not worth the risk. Magtape is the best

Re: [Discuss] Revisiting VMWare ESX backup options

2014-10-29 Thread Jack Coats
3-2-1 rule - 3 copies, on 2 different types of media, 1 copy offsite. That is the minimum. I have done 2 on disk (local in different disk pools on different machines), 1 on tape, 1 local, 1 offsite). For home, I am lazy. So it 'slightly' violates my own rules. OK if you consider 'cloud' a

Re: [Discuss] Revisiting VMWare ESX backup options

2014-10-29 Thread Richard Pieri
On 10/29/2014 2:54 PM, Nathan Burridge wrote: Have you looked into VMWare's Data Protection which is offered for free? Yeah... and I dismissed it based on the outright lies that make up the ad copy: Traditional data backup and data recovery solutions are expensive, slow and complex.