Re: [Discuss] Delivering mail to folders

2016-02-01 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (blu)
> From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On > Behalf Of Tom Metro > > > Ever-so-slightly better than no encryption. > > Huh? We're talking about using a self-signed cert for IMAP access, right? > > Self-signed certs have all the same cryptographic benefits as a CA >

Re: [Discuss] Delivering mail to folders

2016-02-01 Thread John Abreau
Apparently I've been doing it "wrong" all these years. I've always created my own CA and signed my certificates with it, and I thought that's what the term "self-signed" meant. On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote: > > From: Discuss

Re: [Discuss] Delivering mail to folders

2016-02-01 Thread Rich Pieri
Dovecot can be a little quirky about the location of INBOX. You can specify it with the mail_location directive in Dovecot's local.conf file. -- Rich P. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [Discuss] Delivering mail to folders

2016-02-01 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (blu)
> From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On > Behalf Of David Kramer > > would > it be reasonable and possible to use a self-signed cert for starters Ever-so-slightly better than no encryption. The only difference is whether or not it's possible for someone to

Re: [Discuss] Delivering mail to folders

2016-02-01 Thread Tom Metro
Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote: >David Kramer wrote: >> ...would it be reasonable and possible to use a self-signed cert for >> starters... > > Ever-so-slightly better than no encryption. Huh? We're talking about using a self-signed cert for IMAP access, right? Self-signed certs have all the