> From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On
> Behalf Of Tom Metro
>
> > Ever-so-slightly better than no encryption.
>
> Huh? We're talking about using a self-signed cert for IMAP access, right?
>
> Self-signed certs have all the same cryptographic benefits as a CA
>
Apparently I've been doing it "wrong" all these years. I've always created
my own CA and signed my certificates with it, and I thought that's what the
term "self-signed" meant.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu)
wrote:
> > From: Discuss
Dovecot can be a little quirky about the location of INBOX. You can
specify it with the mail_location directive in Dovecot's local.conf file.
--
Rich P.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On
> Behalf Of David Kramer
>
> would
> it be reasonable and possible to use a self-signed cert for starters
Ever-so-slightly better than no encryption. The only difference is whether or
not it's possible for someone to
Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote:
>David Kramer wrote:
>> ...would it be reasonable and possible to use a self-signed cert for
>> starters...
>
> Ever-so-slightly better than no encryption.
Huh? We're talking about using a self-signed cert for IMAP access, right?
Self-signed certs have all the