On 1/11/2014 3:59 PM, MBR wrote:
Anyway, it's nice to hear that I'm not the only programmer in the
world that thinks it's valuable to have higher resolution to allow you
to see more code on the screen.
RANT
What I'd like to see is higher /VISIBILITY/, irrespective of the
resolution.
Interesting take, Dan. The more expensive Lenovo (the one that is also
a touchscreen Android device) does pivot all the way from horizontal
to vertical, so it looks like a first pass at your concept in a
smaller size. That one isn't due until summer.
Did you ever get to play with the original
Actually, they did the transition from 1600x1200 to 1920x1080 in two
steps. I went from a 1600x1200 (UXGA) screen to a 1920x1200 (WUXGA)
screen on 15 laptops, and I agree that the increase in width wasn't a
really big deal for me. Then they dropped from 1920x1200 (WUXGA) to
1920x1080 (FHD),
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:59:18 -0500, MBR wrote:
Actually, they did the transition from 1600x1200 to 1920x1080 in two steps.
I went from a 1600x1200 (UXGA) screen to a 1920x1200 (WUXGA) screen on 15
laptops, and I agree that the increase in width wasn't a really big deal for
me. Then they
On 01/11/2014 08:22 AM, John Abreau wrote:
Personally, I find the vertical resolution more important than the
horizontal. When the industry abandoned 1600x1200 in favor of 1920x1080,
the increase from 1600 to 1920 wasn't that big a deal, but the decrease
from 1200 to 1080 was extremely painful.
It's a bit bigger than 24, but two 28 UHD (aka 4K, actually
3840x2160) monitors (Dell for $699 and Lenovo for $799) were announced
at CES. Lenovo also announced something that is a 28 UHD monitor plus
an Android touchscreen device ($1199). Not sure exactly when they will
be available. Dell already
