Original Message
Subject: Re: [Discuss] copyright contributor question
Local Time: September 21, 2016 12:04 PM
UTC Time: September 21, 2016 4:04 PM
From: bill.n1...@gmail.com
To: Eric Chadbourne <sillystr...@protonmail.com>
Boston Linux and Unix <discuss@blu.org>
1.
1. Proton mail security requires gmail to discard/spam any message
forwarded by this list just like yahoo. I have an exception list in gmail
so I can see this .
2. If you have made the only fix lately, yes, add yourself just as a good
maintainer would if accepting big set of patches. Are you
When is it appropriate to add my name to some abandoned code that I have
significantly changed? Copyrighted by a person and under the GPL. Add a section
for contributors?
Thanks,
Eric
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
Are you a contractor who develops or supports GPL software for clients?
I've been working on clarifying the best practices and boilerplate
contract language that addresses Copyright in a GPL world.
https://freephile.org/wiki/index.php/Copyright Feedback/Contributions
please.
Greg Rundlett
[meant to reply-all]
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Marcia K Wilbur ai...@faqlinux.com
wrote:
Hi Greg,
You may or may not know this but I am always eager to jump into any
licensing/copyright discussion or review. However, I cannot seem to access
this document at this time. Is there
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Greg Rundlett (freephile)
g...@freephile.com wrote:
I've been working on clarifying the best practices and boilerplate
contract language that addresses Copyright in a GPL world.
That's a good thing to do, thank you. Well done re the Trigger and AGPL.
Might want
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 22:17:47 -0500
Tom Metro tmetro+...@gmail.com wrote:
...the source code for a limited term...
Which keeps growing...
THIS is a problem.
--
Rich P.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
Rich Pieri wrote:
Access to the source code isn't a right. Quite the opposite: denying
access to the source code for a limited term is a right guaranteed by
the Constitution and the Copyright Act of 1976.
Minor nitpick, but access to the source has nothing to do with
copyright. The concept of
