Tom Luo:
> Hi, all,
>
> Thanks for answers. I just feel docker should support the feature to hide
> all details inside the container and just expose a port.
How would you do that? Encrypt the container?
See my previous discussion of how that doesn't actually work.
-dsr-
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 23:53:52 -0500
Tom Luo wrote:
> Thanks for answers. I just feel docker should support the feature to
> hide all details inside the container and just expose a port.
We explained why this is not possible. Your desire to be proprietary
cannot change reality.
--
Rich Pieri
Is there any alternative besides docker?
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 10:24 AM Rich Pieri wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 23:53:52 -0500
> Tom Luo wrote:
>
> > Thanks for answers. I just feel docker should support the feature to
> > hide all details inside the container and just expose a port.
>
> We
Tom Luo:
> Is there any alternative besides docker?
Yes.
You can:
- set up servers and sell the service of access to your nifty
idea rather than shipping code to the users.
- ask your users to sign a contract that says that they will
not read through the source code or re-use
