Hi Todd, Scott,
Am Sun, 10 Oct 2010 00:48:23 -0400 schrieb todd rme:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote:
Le 2010-10-09 16:50, Scott Furry a écrit :
On 09/10/10 02:11 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
snip
I agree, direction from the whole community on this, now that we
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:09 PM, jonathon jonathon.bl...@gmail.com wrote:
skipped
Note # 4: The copyright list states who the copyright holder was, when
it was published, not who the current copyright holder is;
Wrong. Copyright notice reflects a name of copyright holder and year
when code was
Jon,
I really agree with you.
Its not about how the 'name' works for any of us, but for potential users.
As bad as it may sound, we need to think as if we were actually
relying on marketing it as a paid product (which I am not advocating)
but still need to think about market reactions as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please, don't enter into political consideration of something that was
just a bug. It was me that screwed it up and during the pre-announcement
phase sprint, I forgot to regenerate the product IDs and thus LO had the
product IDs of OOo. This is fixed
Le 2010-10-12 02:32, Eric Hoch a écrit :
Hi Todd, Scott,
Am Sun, 10 Oct 2010 00:48:23 -0400 schrieb todd rme:
There is another, somewhat independent issue that has occurred to me.
What about how the components are split up? The issues are somewhat
different for windows and mac than they are
Le 2010-10-12 07:54, Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 2010-10-12 5:36 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
My personal opinion is that Libre is more representative of the
understanding behind the LibreOffice philosophy, but that OpenOffice
at this point does have the marketing advantage of the brand.
As I said, I
Hi All,
Today I worked on the versioninfo sections of LibO Windows
executables. See: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30798
Please let me know when you reach consensus upon what to use as
CompanyName and LegalCopyright. For those who don't know, these
appear in the file properties
On 2010-10-09 5:23 PM, Scott Furry wrote:
How do you expect LibreOffice to be updated?
I'll treat all questions as if you had asked not what I 'expect', but
what I would *like* to see...
Mac and Windows should have auto-updaters, Linux should have an
auto-updater available only when installed
On 2010-10-10 12:48 AM, todd rme wrote:
There is another, somewhat independent issue that has occurred to me.
What about how the components are split up? The issues are somewhat
different for windows and mac than they are for linux.
The bottom line reality is, they are not split up now, and
Le 2010-10-12 09:43, Harold Fuchs a écrit :
Currently the only list of e-mail lists (including discuss@ and users@) is
on the Contribute page
http://www.documentfoundation.org/contribution/linked to from the Home
page
http://www.documentfoundation.org/. IMHO this is at least counterintuitive.
Le 2010-10-12 10:26, Per Eriksson a écrit :
We do now have a dedicated mailing list for website issues. It is quite
new, and all website related talks currently take place there.
Thanks a lot, and welcome :-)
Best
Per
Thanks Per
Marc
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to
On 10/12/2010 01:30 AM, Fridrich Strba wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please, don't enter into political consideration of something that was
just a bug. It was me that screwed it up and during the pre-announcement
phase sprint, I forgot to regenerate the product IDs
On 2010-10-12 1:14 PM, todd rme wrote:
In a sense, they are split up. In Linux most distributions seem to
split them up, at least all the ones I have used do, and in windows it
is possible to only install the components you want. I have never
tried it on Mac so I don't know for certain.
The
Hi Stefan,
2010/10/12 Stefan Weigel stefan.wei...@bildungskreis.org
Hi Jon,
Jon Hamkins schrieb:
To explain what LibreOffice means, first I have to explain what libre
means, because it isn't an English word.
Well, LibreOffice isn´t an English product. It´s made by an international
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Eric Hoch eric_openoff...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Todd,
Am Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:14:49 -0400 schrieb todd rme:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-10-10 12:48 AM, todd rme wrote:
There is another, somewhat
Hi Mirek, *,
Mirek M. schrieb:
Well, I'm a Czech and my native language is Czech. The problem I have
with LibreOffice is that it's just hard to pronounce. I'm not very
good at saying the French r, so I try to say LibreOffice with an
English accent, which doesn't sound very good either.
Hello,
Paul A Norman wrote:
For example, bibliographies in LaTeX
can be built using JabRef - a
Java application that can export/import
to/from an MySql database.
http://jabref.sourceforge.net/
JabRef handles the citations' entries -
all the information.
Over the weekend I'll
Hi Friedrich!
Am Dienstag, den 12.10.2010, 23:01 +0200 schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier:
Finally there will be several flavors of pronunciation - and good
moments if they meat each other! :o))
I hope this was just a typo ;-)))
Cheers,
Christoph
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail
This is border line with marketing, but it is more of a general
concept so I'll write it here instead of on the marketing mailing list
so it can be discussed by more people.
One of the strengths of LibO is (will be... as it was/is for OOo) its
internationalization. But this strength comes not
Hi Guys,
You may find this article interesting:
Can Openoffice.org rival Microsoft with Libre Office?
http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2010/10/12/243295/Can-Openoffice.org-rival-Microsoft-with-Libre-Office.htm
Regards,
Paul
Five ways Libre Office can improve to challenge Microsoft
It would be nice to have something that works really well in
International English, and that sounded good to Asians as well.
Chinese friends inform me that they sometimes have troubole with
words/part words that end in R
My Indian friends for the most part would have no trouble saying the
name
This sort of thing is what I was trying to get at in the thread
Forums, Wikis, mailing lists two days ago.
Paul
On 13 October 2010 03:42, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-10-12 9:43 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote:
Currently the only list of e-mail lists (including discuss@ and
Le 2010-10-13 00:49, Paul A Norman a écrit :
This sort of thing is what I was trying to get at in the thread
Forums, Wikis, mailing lists two days ago.
Paul
On 13 October 2010 03:42, Charles Marcuscmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-10-12 9:43 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote:
Currently the only
23 matches
Mail list logo
