On 01/18/2011 07:41 PM, Fabián Rodríguez wrote:
On 11-01-17 02:23 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Fabian this is a random idea, but is it possible to have users that
submit to the discuss mailing list or a new support mailing list, to
be able to have the questions posted there, and then any
Hi
I have collected some features enteprises will love to have implemented
in LibreOffice and listed them in
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Crazy_Ideas#Features_Enterprises_Will_Love_To_Have_Implemented
Some are quite easy to implement, other may require a longer time for
Hi Andrea,
Andrea Pescetti wrote (18-01-11 21:13)
The OpenOffice.org experience, and the first distribution-specific
LibreOffice bugs like
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@documentfoundation.org/msg04508.html
make me think that fragmentation, while of course allowed by the
license, should be
[ fullquoting for discuss@dfs sake. forgot the CC. Not that it matters
much, but anyways. ]
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13:48AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:13:43PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
It is a good idea to track changes, but it is probably a
Hello,
I believe the best feature for the enterprise will be to port LibreOffice to
HTML5, this could be also installed locally in the clients, needing just a
browser to run.
If LibreOffice doesn't go in direction WebBased, it will be soon irrelevant
in the enterprise (as soon as Google Docs, MS
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:49:51PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
and, possibly, Debian might need to ship an acceptably free version
by their own standards if there were any doubt as to the appropriate
freeness of the LibreOffice code by the standards of the particular
distribution
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:07:03AM +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
I am interested to see Rene's input on this as he is part of the
Debian team.
Thanks, answered both Andrea and Andrew.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive:
At 11:48 19/01/2011, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
Hello,
I believe the best feature for the enterprise will be to port LibreOffice to
HTML5, this could be also installed locally in the clients, needing just a
browser to run.
If LibreOffice doesn't go in direction WebBased, it will be soon
On 01/19/2011 12:15 PM, Christophe Strobbe wrote:
At 11:48 19/01/2011, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
Hello,
I believe the best feature for the enterprise will be to port
LibreOffice to
HTML5, this could be also installed locally in the clients, needing
just a
browser to run.
If LibreOffice
Hi,
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2011-01-18 22.41:
Removed every spam message i had. next time ill forward them to you.
thanks a lot! I will then try to investigate where they come from.
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The
On 2011-01-19 12:43 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Fixing it the right way will be very invasive, and risks breaking the
xls (not xlsx, xls the binary) import and export filters into utterly
useless state (I mean, really useless). This is because so much code is
shared between the xls import/export
Hello Christoph,
sorry, but an HTML5 LibreOffice could be also installed locally in a client,
as I said before. And the LibreOffice Community will only have to maintain
one HTLM5 version for any platform. Now there are 3 versions, Linux, Mac,
Windows.
So, as conclusion, a HTML5 LibreOffice has
I have collected some features enteprises will love to have implemented
in LibreOffice and listed them in
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Crazy_Ideas#Features_Enterprises_Will_Love_To_Have_Implemented
Great, but why is this on the Crazy Ideas page? Those are far from crazy
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 06:52 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-19 12:43 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Fixing it the right way will be very invasive, and risks breaking the
xls (not xlsx, xls the binary) import and export filters into utterly
useless state (I mean, really useless). This is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 09:17 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
Why add something more to bloat the package when an extension already exist?
Probably because the person wants something that works. And the
extension you suggest does not work.
On Wed Jan 19 2011 16:55:15 GMT-0800 (PST) toki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 09:17 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
Why add something more to bloat the package when an extension already exist?
Probably because the person wants something that works. And the
How to use the extension? When the report shows up?
On 20 January 2011 03:05, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
On Wed Jan 19 2011 16:55:15 GMT-0800 (PST) toki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 09:17 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
Why add something more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 03:04 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
On 01/18/2011 07:41 PM, Fabián Rodríguez wrote:
On 11-01-17 02:23 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Fabian this is a random idea, but is it possible to have users that
submit to the discuss mailing list
Þann fim 20.jan 2011 01:05, skrifaði Andy Brown:
On Wed Jan 19 2011 16:55:15 GMT-0800 (PST) toki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 09:17 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
Why add something more to bloat the package when an
extension already exist?
Probably because the
19 matches
Mail list logo
