[tdf-discuss] Custom properties

2011-05-17 Thread rise_mini
Hi, I am using Libreoffice 3.3.2. I have created one document having custom properties. Properties are preserved in .odt format. But when i save as the same document with .doc format all the custom properties have gone. Why it is happening ? It was working fine with openoffice 3.2. Thanks,

Re: [tdf-discuss] Custom properties

2011-05-17 Thread Christophe Strobbe
Hi, On Mon, 16 May 2011 22:54:55 -0700 (PDT), rise_mini meenakshi.kanau...@gmail.com wrote: I am using Libreoffice 3.3.2. I have created one document having custom properties. Properties are preserved in .odt format. But when i save as the same document with .doc format all the custom

[tdf-discuss] Re: Custom properties

2011-05-17 Thread rise_mini
Hi, I have created one document in LibreOffice Writer. It has some custom properties. Firstly I saved it with .odt format. Close and re-open. .odt format document has all the custom properties. Save as with .doc format. Before closing it has all the properties. Close and re-open .doc format

[tdf-discuss] Re: Custom properties

2011-05-17 Thread rise_mini
Hi, I am using LibreOffice 3.3.2 on Ubuntu 10.04. Same problem with calc and impress. Thanks, On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Meenakshi Kanaujia meenakshi.kanau...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have created one document in LibreOffice Writer. It has some custom properties. Firstly I saved it

[tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice dead and burried?

2011-05-17 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 17/05/11 12:49, plino a écrit : Hi plino, What do they mean by handing it back? Are they giving up on the OpenOffice brand? Can someone from TDF shed some light? Nobody seems to know, or if they do, they are keeping wraps on it. The people still around on the openoffice.org lists are

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice dead and burried?

2011-05-17 Thread BRM
- Original Message From: Alexander Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com Le 17/05/11 12:49, plino a écrit : What do they mean by handing it back? Are they giving up on the OpenOffice brand? Can someone from TDF shed some light? Nobody seems to know, or if they do, they are

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice dead and burried?

2011-05-17 Thread Italo Vignoli
On 5/17/11 4:17 PM, BRM wrote: Personally I hope Oracle doesn't drop the ball on it and that OpenOffice proper can become a true community lead project as I haven't yet seen anything from the leadership of TDF to give me confidence they are not doing the same thing they blamed Oracle for, just

[tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice dead and burried?

2011-05-17 Thread plino
@Italo, since you are indeed a member of the SC, can you share with the community more information about the original topic, please? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/OpenOffice-dead-and-burried-tp2951991p2952858.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive

Re: [tdf-discuss] OpenOffice dead and burried?

2011-05-17 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Plino, plino wrote (17-05-11 12:49) [...] What do they mean by handing it back? Are they giving up on the OpenOffice brand? Can someone from TDF shed some light? Probably it will not surprise you when I say that to me it looks best if activities are combined as much as possible, in some

[tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice dead and burried?

2011-05-17 Thread e-letter
Keeping OO separate from LO is a good thing overall; more actors in the open source office software sector gives healthy competition (like Opera and Firefox for web browsers), innovation and shows m$ users the benefits of using a non-proprietary document format. -- Unsubscribe instructions:

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice dead and burried?

2011-05-17 Thread Italo Vignoli
On 05/17/2011 05:17 PM, plino wrote: @Italo, since you are indeed a member of the SC, can you share with the community more information about the original topic, please? Apart from reiterating that we see one community going forward, as we always did (when we originally invited Oracle to