Hi :)
I found a page about Calc in Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org_Calc
but it's heavily branded as the OpenOffice version. Writer has 2 pages. One
for OpenOffice and 1 for LibreOffice.
Would it be better to move towards having just 1 page for each application and
then
Hi,
in our latest SC-Call we discussed the issue about taking and publishing
Screenshots on windows. As we had no quorum in the call, I'd ask every
SC member / deputy to vote on the statement we agreed in the call.
The statement is:
It is noted that several members of the SC acknowledge the
So .. casting my vote
Am 18.07.2011 19:22, schrieb André Schnabel:
The statement is:
It is noted that several members of the SC acknowledge the existence
of a legal risk to display screenshots of LibreOffice on Windows, but
the risk is deemed low, therefore, while screenshots on GNU/Linux
Hi
my vote is to use MS Windows screenshots, for windows-only situations (as in
the install)
Thanks and regards
2011/7/18 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net
Hi,
in our latest SC-Call we discussed the issue about taking and publishing
Screenshots on windows. As we had no quorum in the
Hi,
this topic has already been discussed here at the list and briefly in
our last SC call. But there is no formal decision yet.
To keep the MC operational during the next weeks, I proposed some
changes (approve all current deputies as full members, MC will take
decisions consensus with a
On 7/18/11 7:33 PM, André Schnabel wrote:
1. approve all current deputies of the MC as full MC members. (so the MC
will have 5 members in total - Sophie Gautier, Fridrich Strba, André
Schnabel, Thorsten Behrens, Cor Nouws )
+1
2. approve that the MC should decide on applications in
Hi
1) +1
2) +1
regards
Olivier
2011/7/18 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net
Hi,
this topic has already been discussed here at the list and briefly in our
last SC call. But there is no formal decision yet.
To keep the MC operational during the next weeks, I proposed some changes
Hi all
First of all I find it odd that this release is named RC1. Shouldn't there
be a Beta first?
I found the following bugs in the Windows installer:
1) Forces installation of MS VC++ 2008 x86 9.0.30729.4148 although MS VC++
2008 x86 9.0.30729.6161 was already installed
2) New dictionaries
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:46 PM, plino pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
First of all I find it odd that this release is named RC1. Shouldn't there
be a Beta first?
I found the following bugs in the Windows installer:
1) Forces installation of MS VC++ 2008 x86 9.0.30729.4148 although MS VC++
Jesús Corrius wrote:
This is working fine.
If you don't have the matching version already installed, then the
installer should install the version referenced in the manifests.
If the version is already installed, the VC runtime installer does
nothing. But in this case, it's polite to
No it's not, Jesus.
It is installing a previous version with security issues when a newer fixed
version is already installed.
It should never install if a newer is already installed.
The versions are not overridden, they are installed in parallel.
If you go to your C:\windows\winsxs folder,
On 07/18/2011 06:19 PM, Jesús Corrius wrote:
No it's not, Jesus.
It is installing a previous version with security issues when a newer fixed
version is already installed.
It should never install if a newer is already installed.
The versions are not overridden, they are installed in parallel.
Robert Boehm wrote:
Obviously, if the version preferred by the installer is the only
version that the installed files will work with
is the only choice, then well, OK. But if it's compatible with the
latest version, maybe there is a way to make
sure that the latest version available is
On 07/18/2011 07:04 PM, plino wrote:
Robert Boehm wrote:
Obviously, if the version preferred by the installer is the only
version that the installed files will work with
is the only choice, then well, OK. But if it's compatible with the
latest version, maybe there is a way to make
sure that
On 07/18/2011 05:12 PM, Robert Boehm wrote:
On 07/18/2011 07:04 PM, plino wrote:
Robert Boehm wrote:
Obviously, if the version preferred by the installer is the only
version that the installed files will work with
is the only choice, then well, OK. But if it's compatible with the
latest
NoOp wrote:
I'd recommend a followup to the dev list. plino, when you do that you
might also add links to the security notices for the earlier version of
VC++ 2008.
The Dev list is for devs only. I have unsubscribed from it.
Here is the link
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2538243
--
On 07/18/2011 06:07 PM, plino wrote:
NoOp wrote:
I'd recommend a followup to the dev list. plino, when you do that you
might also add links to the security notices for the earlier version of
VC++ 2008.
The Dev list is for devs only. I have unsubscribed from it.
I got crap for posting
17 matches
Mail list logo
