Hi Florian,
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
as some of you know, the TDF admins had a system operations meeting in
Munich about one month ago:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/System_Operations/Meeting_2011-01
*Some* being the
Hi *,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Christian Lohmaier
lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Christophe Strobbe
christophe.stro...@esat.kuleuven.be wrote:
This address is subscribe, so no moderation necessary, no delays
because of manual intervention.
Hi Christian, All,
This is my fifth attempt to send a response to
the list (after previous attempts on 5, 8, 15 and
26 July). I hope it gets through this time.
At 18:21 5-7-2011, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Christophe, *,
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Christophe Strobbe
Hi Christophe, *,
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Christophe Strobbe
christophe.stro...@esat.kuleuven.be wrote:
At 18:21 5-7-2011, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Christophe Strobbe
christophe.stro...@esat.kuleuven.be wrote:
At 16:14 5-7-2011, Christian Lohmaier
Hello,
2011/7/25 Charles-H. Schulz charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org
Hello Christian,
2011/7/25 Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com
Hi Charles, *;
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
I am very serious
I'm following this thread since the last week and I believe that this
is an extremely important discussion for us all.
I support the initial idea of concentrating our work force on better
ODF support and functionality improvements in LO, but I also
understand the need that people have to use LO
On 2011-07-28 4:40 PM, Jomar Silva homem...@gmail.com wrote:
In summary: It's good to users that we support MSO files, but the real
world side effect of that is that people will keep using MSO files...
it's up to us to find a way to change the Status Quo in a smooth way
It'll never happen...
Hi
What you say is almost that we should give up on ODF and stick with
Microsoft formats...
I would prefer that LO import MSO format flawlessly but not export them at
all...
Olivier
2011/7/28 Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
On 2011-07-28 4:40 PM, Jomar Silva homem...@gmail.com wrote:
Disagree.
If we dont support ms file formats, the users will keep bying ms office. If
we support ms formats users who are willing to shift will be abole to shift.
Today one of the most important stopperts is problems with legacy documents
and exchange of documents with external parties.
First
Leif Lodahl wrote:
Disagree.
If we dont support ms file formats, the users will keep bying ms office. If
we support ms formats users who are willing to shift will be abole to shift.
Today one of the most important stopperts is problems with legacy documents
and exchange of documents with
Jomar Silva wrote:
I support the initial idea of concentrating our work force on better
ODF support and functionality improvements in LO, but I also
understand the need that people have to use LO to manipulate MSO
documents.
I think both is crucial to the success of LibO.
Since this
Thank you very much for this. I had completely fogotten.
Leif
Den 28/07/2011 23.19 skrev Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org:
Jomar Silva wrote:
I support the initial idea of concentrating our work force on better
ODF support and functionality improvements in LO, but I also
On 07/28/2011 04:21 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
All that I see know for sure is that it took 5 years and the code
still is not in the repo.
IBM claims that since it was in an OOo 1.1.x branch, it was in the repo,
and that it is Sun's fault that it wasn't incorporated into OOo 2.x, or
OOo
On 29/07/11 00:03, toki wrote:
On 07/28/2011 04:21 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
All that I see know for sure is that it took 5 years and the code
still is not in the repo.
IBM claims that since it was in an OOo 1.1.x branch, it was in the repo,
and that it is Sun's fault that it wasn't
14 matches
Mail list logo
